Establishing exemptions for third-party food delivery services from the limits on fees charged by such services on food service establishments.
Introduced
Moved
Reached a final decision
Became law
Derived from the official record below.
Officially: “A Local Law to amend the administrative code of the city of New York, in relation to establishing exemptions for third-party food delivery services from the limits on fees charged by such services on food service establishments” Read the full text
Consumer and Worker Protection
What it does
The current cap on fees that a third-party delivery service may charge a restaurant for the use of their service is 15% for delivery, 3% for credit card processing, and 5% for any other fees – these percentages are calculated per order. This bill would allow third-party delivery services to charge a restaurant an additional 20% for enhanced services. It would only permit the use of the enhanced service fee, however, if the delivery service offers the option to purchase a basic service at a cost no higher than the current fee limits, and if such basic service includes the option to obtain delivery services and be listed and discoverable on the third-party platform. This bill would require third-party delivery services to notify restaurants that have an existing agreement with such service about the new services offered, the caps on fees, and any changes that would be made to the service fees. It would also require third-party delivery services to prepare monthly transaction statements that include an itemized list of fees charged to restaurants. This bill would also restrict third-party food delivery services from purchasing the name of a restaurant for purposes of internet advertising. This bill would allow restaurants to include marketing materials in orders made through third-party food delivery services, and it would not prohibit restaurants from charging different prices for items ordered through a third-party food delivery service. This bill would also update the reporting requirements regarding the fee caps, requiring the Department of Consumer and Worker Protection to report on the effect of the fee caps and the number of violations issued under this subchapter.
Summary written by City Council staff, from the official record. Plain-language AI rewrite with cited sections coming. Not legal advice.
Where it is
Introduced by Council · Apr 11, 2024
Referred to Comm by Council · Apr 11, 2024
Hearing Held by Committee · Jun 21, 2024
Committee on Consumer and Worker Protection
Laid Over by Committee · Jun 21, 2024
Committee on Consumer and Worker Protection
Hearing Held by Committee · May 1, 2025
Committee on Consumer and Worker Protection
Amendment Proposed by Comm · May 1, 2025
Committee on Consumer and Worker Protection
Amended by Committee · May 1, 2025
Committee on Consumer and Worker Protection
Approved by Committee · May 1, 2025
Committee on Consumer and Worker Protection
Approved by Council · May 1, 2025
Sent to Mayor by Council · May 1, 2025
City Charter Rule Adopted · May 31, 2025
Administration
Returned Unsigned by Mayor · Jun 2, 2025
Official documents
Summary of Int. No. 762-B
officialSummary of Int. No. 762-A
officialSummary of Int. No. 762
officialInt. No. 762
officialApril 11, 2024 - Stated Meeting Agenda
officialHearing Transcript - Stated Meeting 4-11-24
officialMinutes of the Stated Meeting - April 11, 2024
officialCommittee Report 6/21/24
officialHearing Testimony 6/21/24
officialHearing Transcript 6/21/24
officialProposed Int. No. 762-A - 11/14/24
officialProposed Int. No. 762-B - 4/24/25
officialCommittee Report 5/1/25
officialHearing Transcript 5/1/25
officialCommittee Report - Stated Meeting
officialMay 1, 2025 - Stated Meeting Agenda
officialHearing Transcript - Stated Meeting 5-1-25
officialInt. No. 762-B (FINAL)
officialInt. No. 762-B - Fiscal Impact Statement - City Council
officialInt. No. 762-B - Fiscal Impact Statement - OMB
officialStraight from the Council record: fiscal impact statements, committee reports, and hearing transcripts as filed.
The numbers
29
sponsors on the bill
Sponsors
Rafael Salamanca, Jr.Robert F. HoldenJulie MeninShaun AbreuNantasha M. WilliamsAlthea V. StevensChris BanksRita C. JosephCarmen N. De La RosaKevin C. RileyOswald J. FelizMercedes NarcisseEric DinowitzKamillah HanksChi A. OsséYusef SalaamGale A. BrewerDiana I. AyalaAmanda C. FaríasSandra UngCrystal HudsonSusan ZhuangFarah N. LouisJennifer GutiérrezVickie PaladinoDavid M. CarrInna VernikovKristy MarmoratoFrank Morano
Who is lobbying on this
Grubhub Holdings Inc.via Grubhub Holdings Inc. · Transportation
8 filingsUber Technologies, Inc.via ParkPoint Strategies, LLC · Technology, Telecommunications & Other Media
7 filingsUber Technologies, Inc.via Uber Technologies, Inc. · Technology, Telecommunications & Other Media
7 filingsDoorDash, Inc.via DoorDash, Inc. · Technology, Telecommunications & Other Media
5 filingsDoorDash, Inc.via Kline Public Strategies LLC · Technology, Telecommunications & Other Media
4 filingsGrubhub Holdings Inc.via Allied Government Affairs LLC · Technology, Telecommunications & Other Media
2 filingsStaten Island Chamber of Commercevia Staten Island Chamber of Commerce · Trade Associations
2 filingsDoorDash, Inc.via DCI Group AZ, LLC · Technology, Telecommunications & Other Media
1 filingFrom 38 City Clerk eLobbyist filings naming this bill (2024). Filings are self-reported by lobbying firms and show who is paid to influence this bill. They do not say which side, or whether it worked.
Every fact on this page links to its source, starting with the official bill record. Last action: Returned Unsigned by Mayor (Jun 2, 2025).