Creation of a task force to review the impacts of artificial intelligence on civil service and civil service employees.
Introduced
Moved
Reached a final decision
Became law
Derived from the official record below.
Officially: “A Local Law to conduct a study and publish a report on the impacts of algorithmic tools and automated employment decision tools on employees” Read the full text
Civil Service and Labor
What it does
This bill would require the Department of Information Technology and Telecommunications (DOITT) to assess the impacts of algorithmic tools and automated decision systems (ADS) on the administration of the civil service. Such assessment would include the impacts of algorithmic tools and ADS on how civil service employees are hired, how job functions have been impacted, and what feedback has been received from employees. This bill would also require DOITT to submit a report on the findings of such study to the mayor and the speaker of the Council.
Summary written by City Council staff, from the official record. Plain-language AI rewrite with cited sections coming. Not legal advice.
Where it is
Introduced by Council · Sep 26, 2024
Referred to Comm by Council · Sep 26, 2024
Hearing Held by Committee · Jun 26, 2025
Committee on Civil Service and Labor
Hearing Held by Committee · Jun 26, 2025
Committee on Technology
Laid Over by Committee · Jun 26, 2025
Committee on Civil Service and Labor
Laid Over by Committee · Jun 26, 2025
Committee on Technology
Hearing Held by Committee · Dec 18, 2025
Committee on Civil Service and Labor
Amendment Proposed by Comm · Dec 18, 2025
Committee on Civil Service and Labor
Amended by Committee · Dec 18, 2025
Committee on Civil Service and Labor
Approved by Committee · Dec 18, 2025
Committee on Civil Service and Labor
Approved by Council · Dec 18, 2025
Sent to Mayor by Council · Dec 18, 2025
City Charter Rule Adopted · Jan 17, 2026
Administration
Returned Unsigned by Mayor · Jan 20, 2026
Official documents
Summary of Int. No. 1066-A
officialSummary of Int. No. 1066
officialInt. No. 1066
officialSeptember 26, 2024 - Stated Meeting Agenda
officialHearing Transcript - Stated Meeting 9-26-24
officialMinutes of the Stated Meeting - September 26, 2024
officialCommittee Report 6/26/25
officialFiscal Impact Statement - City Council
officialFiscal Impact Statement - OMB
officialHearing Testimony 6/26/25
officialHearing Transcript 6/26/25
officialProposed Int. No. 1066-A - 12/12/25
officialCommittee Report 12/18/25
officialDecember 18, 2025 - Stated Meeting Agenda
officialInt. No. 1066-A (FINAL)
officialInt. No. 1066-A - Fiscal Impact Statement - City Council
officialHearing Transcript - Stated Meeting 12-18-25
officialLocal Law 25
officialStraight from the Council record: fiscal impact statements, committee reports, and hearing transcripts as filed.
The numbers
18
sponsors on the bill
Sponsors
Nantasha M. WilliamsJulie MeninJennifer GutiérrezFarah N. LouisChi A. OsséSandy NurseKevin C. RileyChris BanksShahana K. HanifCrystal HudsonJames F. GennaroAlthea V. StevensDiana I. AyalaKamillah HanksOswald J. FelizLynn C. SchulmanCarmen N. De La RosaTiffany L. Cabán
Who is lobbying on this
Microsoft Corporationvia The Parkside Group, LLC · Technology, Telecommunications & Other Media
2 filingsDistrict Council 37via District Council 37 · Labor
1 filingFrom 3 City Clerk eLobbyist filings naming this bill (2025). Filings are self-reported by lobbying firms and show who is paid to influence this bill. They do not say which side, or whether it worked.
Every fact on this page links to its source, starting with the official bill record. Last action: Returned Unsigned by Mayor (Jan 20, 2026).