govt.fyi
US Congress · S. 3966 · Passed the Senate

TREY'S Law

Introduced
Moved
Reached a final decision
Introduced 2026-03-03
Derived from the official record below.

Officially: “TREY'S Law Read the full text

Law

What it does

The bill makes nondisclosure clauses in contracts unenforceable to the extent they stop a victim of child sexual abuse from disclosing the abuse or related facts, or stop someone else from disclosing those facts in support of the victim's right to speak. Settlement amounts and other payment terms can still be kept confidential, as long as that confidentiality does not block the victim's disclosure. This applies to agreements signed before or after the bill becomes law, and overrides any state law that would otherwise let such clauses be enforced.
Written by AI from the complete official bill text and independently fact-checked against it. Not legal advice.

Read it in plain language

AI plain language5 sections
Written by AI from the complete official bill text and independently fact-checked against it. Not legal advice.
1Short title

This section would let the Act be called the Terminating Restrictive Enforcement of Youth Settlements Law, or TREY'S Law.

Show official text
Official text, verbatim from the record

1. Short title This Act may be cited as the Terminating Restrictive Enforcement of Youth Settlements Law or TREY'S Law .

2Findings and purposes

This section lays out Congress's findings and the purposes behind the Act. Congress states that sexual abuse of minors, including abuse carried out through channels of interstate commerce, is a matter of national concern, and that nondisclosure and confidentiality agreements, often made using those same channels, have been used to silence survivors of sexual abuse and to hide abuse that is ongoing or repeated. Congress finds that enforcing these agreements interferes with reporting to law enforcement agencies, child protection authorities, federal regulators, members of Congress, and the courts, and frustrates enforcement of federal criminal and civil law. Congress finds that sexual abuse and trafficking of minors are already crimes under federal law, including chapter 110 of title 18, United States Code, and section 1591 of title 18, United States Code, and that nondisclosure agreements covering such abuse interfere with reporting to law enforcement, child protection authorities, courts, federal regulators, and members of Congress; frustrate investigation and prosecution of federal crimes; discourage cooperation with law enforcement; and act as private tools to obstruct justice. Congress states that it has authority under the Necessary and Proper Clause (article I, section 8, clause 18 of the Constitution) to make sure private agreements are not used to impede enforcement of federal criminal and civil law that protects minors from sexual exploitation and abuse. Congress further finds that survivors of child sexual abuse have constitutional interests, secured by the Bill of Rights as applied to the states through the 14th Amendment, in reporting crimes, seeking redress through the courts, cooperating with law enforcement, and petitioning the government for protection and enforcement; that when state courts or other state governmental authorities enforce nondisclosure or confidentiality provisions that block disclosure of sexual abuse of a minor, that enforcement counts as state action for purposes of the 14th Amendment; and that judicial enforcement of such provisions may deprive survivors of due process, equal protection, and meaningful access to the courts, including rights derived from the First Amendment as incorporated against the states. Congress finds that agreements which obstruct justice, suppress reporting of crimes, or conceal criminal conduct have long been treated at common law, including at the founding of the United States, as void and unenforceable as against public policy and outside the traditional scope of protected contractual liberty, and that at the founding, private agreements meant to suppress prosecution, conceal felonies, or restrain the reporting of crimes were not recognized as valid or enforceable contracts, with no party holding a vested right to their judicial enforcement. Congress states that it has authority under section 5 of the 14th Amendment to enact appropriate remedial and preventive legislation to prevent and remedy constitutional violations arising from state judicial enforcement of private agreements that suppress disclosure of criminal conduct involving minors. The section states that the purposes of the Act are: to enforce the guarantees of the 14th Amendment, including the right to petition the government for redress of grievances and the right of access to courts, by preventing state courts and other governmental authorities from enforcing nondisclosure or confidentiality provisions that suppress disclosure of sexual abuse of minors; to use Congress's authority under article I, including the Necessary and Proper Clause, to ensure that private agreements are not used to obstruct the investigation or prosecution of federal crimes involving the sexual abuse or trafficking of minors; to preserve access to courts and the right to petition the government for redress of grievances; and to ensure that survivors of sexual abuse of minors, and persons who know of such abuse, may disclose it freely and without fear of civil liability.

Show official text
Official text, verbatim from the record

2. Findings and purposes (a) Findings (1) Instrumentalities of interstate commerce Congress finds the following: (A) Sexual abuse of minors, including abuse facilitated through instrumentalities of interstate commerce, is a matter of national concern. (B) Agreements containing nondisclosure and confidentiality provisions, frequently concluded through the instrumentalities of interstate commerce, have been used to silence survivors of sexual abuse and conceal ongoing or repeated abuse. (C) The enforcement of such provisions interferes with reporting to law enforcement agencies, child protection authorities, Federal regulators, Members of Congress, and the courts, and frustrates the enforcement of Federal criminal and civil law. (2) Necessary and proper clause and enforcement of Federal criminal law Congress further finds the following: (A) Sexual abuse and trafficking of minors are prohibited under Federal criminal law, including chapter 110 of title 18, United States Code, and section 1591 of title 18, United States Code. (B) Nondisclosure and confidentiality agreements that prohibit or restrict disclosure of sexual abuse of a minor interfere with reporting to law enforcement, child protection authorities, courts, Federal regulators, and Members of Congress. (C) Such agreements frustrate the investigation and prosecution of Federal crimes, chill cooperation with law enforcement, and function as private mechanisms to obstruct justice. (D) Congress has authority under clause 18 of section 8 of article I of the Constitution of the United States (commonly known as the Necessary and Proper Clause ) to ensure that private agreements are not used to impede the enforcement of Federal criminal and civil law protecting minors from sexual exploitation and abuse. (3) State action and section 5 of the 14th Amendment Congress further finds the following: (A) Survivors of child sexual abuse possess fundamental constitutional interests, secured by provisions of the Bill of Rights as incorporated against the States through the 14th Amendment to the Constitution of the United States, in reporting crimes, seeking redress through the courts, cooperating with law enforcement, and petitioning the government for protection and enforcement. (B) When State courts or other governmental authorities enforce nondisclosure or confidentiality provisions that prohibit or restrict disclosure of sexual abuse of a minor, such enforcement constitutes State action for purposes of the 14th Amendment to the Constitution of the United States. (C) Judicial enforcement of such provisions may deprive survivors of due process of law, equal protection of the laws, and meaningful access to courts, including rights derived from the First Amendment to the Constitution of the United States and incorporated against the States, in violation of the 14th Amendment. (D) Agreements that obstruct justice, suppress the reporting of crimes, or conceal criminal conduct have long been regarded at common law, including at the time of the founding of the United States, as void and unenforceable as against public policy, and fall outside the traditional scope of protected contractual liberty. (E) At the time of the founding of the United States, private agreements purporting to suppress prosecution, conceal felonies, or restrain the reporting of crimes were not recognized as valid or enforceable contracts, and no party possessed a vested right in their judicial enforcement. (F) Congress has authority under section 5 of the 14th Amendment to the Constitution of the United States to enact appropriate remedial and preventive legislation to prevent and remedy constitutional violations arising from State judicial enforcement of private agreements that suppress disclosure of criminal conduct involving minors. (b) Purpose The purpose of this Act is— (1) to enforce the guarantees of the 14th Amendment to the Constitution of the United States, including the right to petition the government for redress of grievances and the right of access to courts, by preventing State courts and other governmental authorities from enforcing nondisclosure or confidentiality provisions that suppress disclosure of sexual abuse of minors; (2) to ensure, pursuant to the authority of Congress under article I of the Constitution of the United States, including the Necessary and Proper Clause, that private agreements are not used to obstruct the investigation or prosecution of Federal crimes involving the sexual abuse or trafficking of minors; (3) to preserve access to courts and the right to petition the government for redress of grievances; and (4) to ensure that survivors of sexual abuse of minors, and persons with knowledge of such abuse, may disclose such abuse freely and without fear of civil liability.

3Definitions

This section would define three terms used in the Act. Minor person would mean an individual who has not yet turned 18 years old. Nondisclosure clause would mean a provision in a contract or agreement that stops one or more parties to that contract or agreement from disclosing conduct or information covered by its terms and conditions. Sexual abuse against a minor person would mean conduct that constitutes or is alleged to constitute an offense under chapter 110 of title 18, United States Code, or sex trafficking of a minor person under section 1591 of title 18, United States Code, or any sexual act or sexual contact involving a minor person that is a criminal offense under federal law or under the law of the state where the act or contact occurred.

Show official text
Official text, verbatim from the record

3. Definitions In this Act: (1) Minor person The term minor person means an individual who has not attained 18 years of age. (2) Nondisclosure clause The term nondisclosure clause means a provision in a contract or agreement that prohibits 1 or more parties to the contract or agreement from disclosing conduct or information covered by the terms and conditions of the contract or agreement. (3) Sexual abuse against a minor person The term sexual abuse against a minor person means— (A) conduct that constitutes or allegedly constitutes— (i) an offense under chapter 110 of title 18, United States Code; or (ii) sex trafficking of a minor person under section 1591 of title 18, United States Code; or (B) any sexual act or sexual contact involving a minor person that constitutes a criminal offense under Federal law or the law of the State in which the act or contact occurs.

4Nondisclosure agreements void and unenforceable

This section would make a nondisclosure clause void and unenforceable as against public policy, but only to the extent that it prohibits a victim or alleged victim of sexual abuse against a minor person from disclosing that act of sexual abuse or facts related to it, or prohibits any other person from disclosing facts related to that sexual abuse when doing so is in support of, in furtherance of, or consistent with the victim's or alleged victim's right to disclose. The section would also make clear that nothing in it stops a person, including a victim or alleged victim of sexual abuse against a minor person, from entering into a contract or agreement that restricts another party, including an alleged perpetrator, from disclosing other information, such as the amount or payment terms of a settlement, as long as that restriction does not prevent the disclosures that this section protects.

Show official text
Official text, verbatim from the record

4. Nondisclosure agreements void and unenforceable (a) In general A nondisclosure clause shall be void and unenforceable as against public policy only to the extent that the nondisclosure clause prohibits— (1) a victim or alleged victim of sexual abuse against a minor person from disclosing— (A) that act of sexual abuse against a minor person; or (B) facts related to that act of sexual abuse against a minor person; or (2) any other person from disclosing facts related to sexual abuse against a minor person described in paragraph (1) in support of, in furtherance of, or consistent with the right of a victim or alleged victim to disclose under that paragraph. (b) Permissible confidentiality Nothing in this section shall be construed to prohibit a person, including a victim or alleged victim of sexual abuse against a minor person, from entering into a contract or agreement that restricts the disclosure of information, including the amount or payment terms of a settlement, by another party to the contract or agreement, including an alleged perpetrator, so long as such restriction does not prevent disclosure protected under subsection (a).

5Retroactive application

This section would apply the Act to any nondisclosure clause in a contract or agreement, whether the contract or agreement was entered into before, on, or after the Act's enactment date. No person could enforce or attempt to enforce a nondisclosure clause described in section 4(a), regardless of when the contract or agreement containing it was entered into. This Act would supersede any state law to the extent that the state law permits enforcement of a provision whose enforcement this Act prohibits. Nothing in the Act would be construed to stop a state or locality from enacting legislation that is consistent with the Act or that provides greater protection to a victim of sexual abuse against a minor person than the Act provides.

Show official text
Official text, verbatim from the record

5. Retroactive application (a) In general This Act shall apply to any nondisclosure clause in a contract or agreement entered into before, on, or after the date of enactment of this Act. (b) No enforcement actions No person may enforce or attempt to enforce a nondisclosure clause described in section 4(a), regardless of the date on which the contract or agreement containing the nondisclosure clause was entered into. (c) Preemption (1) In general This Act supersedes any State law to the extent that such law permits enforcement of a provision, the enforcement of which is prohibited under this Act. (2) Rule of construction Nothing in this Act shall be construed to prohibit a State or locality from enacting legislation that— (A) is consistent with this Act; or (B) provides greater protection to a victim of sexual abuse against a minor person than is provided under this Act.

AI plain languageRead the whole bill in plain language, 5 sections

Where it is

Introduced · 2026-03-03

In the Senate.

Passed the Senate · 2026-05-20
House floor vote · next · the next step

Official documents

The on-site text is shown verbatim from the GovInfo publication, captured 2026-07-23. The same version at GovInfo.

The numbers

29%
of bills that passed one chamber became law in the 118th Congress, 2023 to 2024 (n=939)
21
sponsors, out of 51 needed to pass

Who is lobbying on this

AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR JUSTICEvia AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR JUSTICE
2 filings
NO MORE VICTIMSvia AXADVOCACY GOVERNMENT RELATIONS
2 filings
NATIONAL WOMEN'S LAW CENTER ACTION FUNDvia NATIONAL WOMEN'S LAW CENTER ACTION FUND
1 filing
From 5 filings in federal lobbying disclosures (LDA), via lda.gov, naming this bill (2026). Filings are self-reported by lobbying firms and show who is paid to influence this bill. They do not say which side, or whether it worked.
Every fact on this page links to its source, starting with the official bill record. Last action: Held at the desk. (2026-05-20).