govt.fyi
US Congress · S. 2379 · Passed the Senate

Countering Threats and Attacks on Our Judges Act

Introduced
Moved
Reached a final decision
Introduced 2025-07-22
Derived from the official record below.

Officially: “Countering Threats and Attacks on Our Judges Act Read the full text

Law

What it does

Countering Threats and Attacks on Our Judges Act This bill allows funds awarded by the State Justice Institute to be used to establish, implement, and operate a judicial threat and intelligence resource center. The State Justice Institute is a private, nonprofit corporation established by federal law to support and improve the administration of justice in state courts.
Summary by the Congressional Research Service, from the official record. Plain-language version below. Not legal advice.

Read it in plain language

AI plain language4 sections
Written by AI from the complete official bill text and independently fact-checked against it. Not legal advice.
1Short title

This section would let this Act be called the Countering Threats and Attacks on Our Judges Act.

Show official text
Official text, verbatim from the record

1. Short title This Act may be cited as the Countering Threats and Attacks on Our Judges Act .

2Definitions

This section would add a definition of eligible organization to the State Justice Institute Act of 1984. Under this definition, an eligible organization is a national nonprofit organization that meets all of the following: it provides technical assistance and training on judicial security and safety at the State and local levels and has expertise and national-level experience in that area; it has experience in courthouse design and courthouse security design standards; it understands State judicial operations and public access to judicial services; and it has experience working with a wide range of judges and court systems, including understanding the challenges facing trial courts, appellate courts, rural courts, and limited-jurisdiction courts at the State and local levels. The section also makes small wording changes to the end of two existing definitions in the same list (removing a trailing and from one and changing a period to a semicolon and and in the other) so the new definition can be added as the last item in the list; those changes do not alter the meaning of the existing definitions.

Show official text
Official text, verbatim from the record

2. Definitions Section 202 of the State Justice Institute Act of 1984 ( 42 U.S.C. 10701 ) is amended— (1) in paragraph (7), by striking and at the end; (2) in paragraph (8)(B), by striking the period at the end and inserting ; and ; and (3) by adding at the end the following: (9) eligible organization means a national nonprofit organization that— (A) provides technical assistance and training on, and has expertise and national-level experience in, judicial security and safety at the State and local levels; (B) has experience in courthouse design and courthouse security design standards; (C) has an understanding of State judicial operations and public access to judicial services; and (D) has experience working with a wide array of different judges and court systems, including an understanding of the challenges facing trial courts, appellate courts, rural courts, and limited-jurisdiction courts at the State and local levels. .

3Establishment of State judicial threat intelligence and resource center

This section would add a new authorized activity to the list of things the State Justice Institute may support under the State Justice Institute Act of 1984. It would let the Institute provide financial and technical support to eligible organizations (as defined in section 2 of this Act) to establish, implement, and operate a State judicial threat and intelligence resource center. That center would: provide technical assistance and training on judicial security, including judicial officer safety education and training for judicial officers, courts, and local law enforcement, creating resources and guides on judicial security, and providing physical security assessments for courts, homes, and other facilities where judicial officers and staff conduct court-related business; proactively monitor threats to the safety of State and local judges and court staff; coordinate with Federal, State, and local law enforcement agencies to mitigate threats to the safety of State and local judges and court staff; develop standardized incident reporting and threat evaluation practices for State and local courts, in coordination with State and local law enforcement and fusion centers; develop a national database for reporting, tracking, and sharing information about threats and incidents toward judicial officers and court staff at the local and State levels, shared with entities that work on judicial security, including State and local law enforcement and fusion centers; and coordinate research to identify, examine, and advance best practices on judicial security. The section also renumbers the list's existing final paragraph (previously paragraph 15) as paragraph 16, without changing its content, to make room for this new paragraph 15.

Show official text
Official text, verbatim from the record

3. Establishment of State judicial threat intelligence and resource center Section 206(c) of the State Justice Institute Act of 1984 ( 42 U.S.C. 10705(c) ) is amended— (1) in paragraph (14), by striking and at the end; (2) by redesignating paragraph (15) as paragraph (16); and (3) by inserting after paragraph (14) the following: (15) to provide financial and technical support to eligible organizations to establish, implement, and operate a State judicial threat and intelligence resource center to— (A) provide technical assistance and training around judicial security, including— (i) providing judicial officer safety education and training for judicial officers, courts, and local law enforcement; (ii) creating resources and guides around judicial security; and (iii) providing physical security assessments for courts, homes, and other facilities where judicial officers and staff conduct court-related business; (B) proactively monitor threats to the safety of State and local judges and court staff; (C) coordinate with Federal, State, and local law enforcement agencies to mitigate threats to the safety of State and local judges and court staff; (D) develop standardized incident reporting and threat evaluation practices for State and local courts in coordination with State and local law enforcement and fusion centers; (E) develop a national database for reporting, tracking, and sharing information about threats and incidents towards judicial officers and court staff at local and State levels with entities working in the interest of judicial security, including State and local law enforcement and fusion centers; and (F) coordinate research to identify, examine, and advance best practices around judicial security. .

4Reports

This section would require the State Justice Institute to submit an annual report to the Senate Committee on the Judiciary and the House Committee on the Judiciary no later than 1 year after a State judicial threat intelligence and resource center is established under the new paragraph (15) added by section 3 of this Act. The report must cover the number of threats made against State and local judiciary members and court staff, broken down by type of threat and level of seriousness.

Show official text
Official text, verbatim from the record

4. Reports Not later than 1 year after the date on which a State judicial threat intelligence and resource center is established under paragraph (15) of section 206(c) of the State Justice Institute Act of 1984, as added by section 3 of this Act, the State Justice Institute shall submit to the Committee on the Judiciary of the Senate and the Committee on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives an annual report on the number of threats to State and local judiciary members and court staff, with breakdown of types of threats and level of seriousness.

AI plain languageRead the whole bill in plain language, 4 sections

Where it is

Introduced · 2025-07-22

In the Senate.

Passed the Senate · 2025-11-20
House floor vote · next · the next step

Official documents

The on-site text is shown verbatim from the GovInfo publication, captured 2026-07-23. The same version at GovInfo.

The numbers

29%
of bills that passed one chamber became law in the 118th Congress, 2023 to 2024 (n=939)
12
sponsors, out of 51 needed to pass

Who is lobbying on this

AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATIONvia AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION
4 filings
EISAI INC.via EISAI INC.
1 filing
From 5 filings in federal lobbying disclosures (LDA), via lda.gov, naming this bill (2025 to 2026). Filings are self-reported by lobbying firms and show who is paid to influence this bill. They do not say which side, or whether it worked.
Every fact on this page links to its source, starting with the official bill record. Last action: Held at the desk. (2025-11-20).