govt.fyi
US Congress · H.R. 4930 · Passed the House

To expand the sharing of information with respect to suspected violations of intellectual property rights in trade.

Introduced
Moved
Reached a final decision
Introduced 2025-08-08
Derived from the official record below.

Officially: “To expand the sharing of information with respect to suspected violations of intellectual property rights in trade. Read the full text

Foreign Trade and International Finance

What it does

This bill expands the authority of U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to provide information to certain persons (e.g., trademark or copyright owners) regarding suspected violations of intellectual property rights in trade. Under current law, if CBP suspects that merchandise is being imported in violation of certain trademark and copyright laws, it may request assistance from specified persons when determining whether the merchandise is imported in violation of these laws. To permit the party to conduct examination and testing, CBP must provide them with specified information that appears
Summary by the Congressional Research Service, from the official record. Plain-language version below. Not legal advice.

Read it in plain language

AI plain language1 section
Written by AI from the complete official bill text and independently fact-checked against it. Not legal advice.
1Sharing of information with respect to suspected violations of intellectual property rights

This section would amend section 628A of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1628a), the law that lets U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) share information about merchandise suspected of violating intellectual property rights. It would raise the standard that triggers this information sharing: instead of a customs officer merely suspecting a violation, the officer would need to have a reasonable suspicion of one. It would also expand what covered items include: wherever the law currently lets CBP share information about the merchandise's packaging, it would now also let CBP share information about packing materials and shipping containers, in every place that term appears in that paragraph. The section would add a new type of information CBP may share: nonpublic information about the merchandise, but only if that information was both generated by an online marketplace or similar market platform, an express consignment operator, a freight forwarder, or any other entity that plays a role in selling or importing the merchandise into the United States or in facilitating that sale or importation, and was also provided to, shared with, or obtained by CBP. Finally, the section would add a new category of party covered by this information sharing authority: any other party with an interest in the merchandise, if the Commissioner of CBP determines that including that party is appropriate.

Show official text
Official text, verbatim from the record

1. Sharing of information with respect to suspected violations of intellectual property rights Section 628A of the Tariff Act of 1930 ( 19 U.S.C. 1628a ) is amended— (1) in subsection (a)— (A) in the matter preceding paragraph (1), by striking suspects and inserting has a reasonable suspicion ; (B) in paragraph (1)— (i) by inserting , packing materials, shipping containers, after its packaging each place it appears; and (ii) by striking ; and and inserting a semicolon; (C) in paragraph (2), by striking the period and inserting ; and ; and (D) by adding at the end the following: (3) may provide to the person nonpublic information about the merchandise that was— (A) generated by an online marketplace or other similar market platform, an express consignment operator, a freight forwarder, or any other entity that plays a role in the sale or importation of merchandise into the United States or the facilitation of such sale or importation; and (B) provided to, shared with, or obtained by, U.S. Customs and Border Protection. ; and (2) in subsection (b)— (A) in paragraph (3), by striking ; and and inserting a semicolon; (B) in paragraph (4), by striking the period at the end and inserting ; and ; and (C) by adding at the end the following: (5) any other party with an interest in the merchandise, as determined appropriate by the Commissioner. .

AI plain languageRead the whole bill in plain language, 1 section

Where it is

Introduced · 2025-08-08

In the House.

Passed the House · 2026-04-27
Senate floor vote · next · the next step

Official documents

The on-site text is shown verbatim from the GovInfo publication, captured 2026-07-23. The same version at GovInfo.

The numbers

29%
of bills that passed one chamber became law in the 118th Congress, 2023 to 2024 (n=939)
7
sponsors, out of 218 needed to pass

Who is lobbying on this

AMERICAN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW ASSOCIATION (AIPLA)via AMERICAN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW ASSOCIATION (AIPLA)
4 filings
INTERNATIONAL ANTICOUNTERFEITING COALITION INCvia THE INTERNATIONAL ANTICOUNTERFEITING COALITION, INC.
4 filings
INTERNATIONAL TRADEMARK ASSOCIATIONvia INTERNATIONAL TRADEMARK ASSOCIATION
4 filings
AMERICAN APPAREL & FOOTWEAR ASSOCIATIONvia AMERICAN APPAREL & FOOTWEAR ASSOCIATION
3 filings
FDD ACTIONvia FDD ACTION
3 filings
FEDEX CORPORATIONvia FEDEX CORPORATION
3 filings
TRAVEL GOODS ASSOCIATIONvia AMERICAN APPAREL & FOOTWEAR ASSOCIATION
3 filings
ENTERTAINMENT SOFTWARE ASSOCIATIONvia ENTERTAINMENT SOFTWARE ASSOCIATION
2 filings
From 28 filings in federal lobbying disclosures (LDA), via lda.gov, naming this bill (2025 to 2026). Filings are self-reported by lobbying firms and show who is paid to influence this bill. They do not say which side, or whether it worked.
Every fact on this page links to its source, starting with the official bill record. Last action: Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance. (2026-04-28).