govt.fyi
US Congress · H.R. 4366 · Passed the House

Save Local Business Act

Introduced
Moved
Reached a final decision
Introduced 2025-07-14
Derived from the official record below.

Officially: “Save Local Business Act Read the full text

Labor and Employment

What it does

Save Local Business Act This bill provides that a person may be considered a joint employer of the employees of another employer under federal labor law only if such person directly, actually, and immediately exercises significant control over the essential terms and conditions of employment. Such control may by demonstrated by hiring and discharging employees; determining individual employee rates of pay and benefits; day-to-day supervision of employees; assigning individual work schedules, positions, or tasks; or administering employee discipline.
Summary by the Congressional Research Service, from the official record. Plain-language version below. Not legal advice.

Read it in plain language

AI plain language2 sections
Written by AI from the complete official bill text and independently fact-checked against it. Not legal advice.
1Short title

This section states that the Act may be called the 'Save Local Business Act.'

Show official text
Official text, verbatim from the record

1. Short title This Act may be cited as the Save Local Business Act .

2Clarification of joint employment

This section would change how the law decides when one employer counts as a 'joint employer' of another employer's workers. Under the National Labor Relations Act, an employer could be treated as a joint employer of another employer's employees only if each employer (both the direct employer and the other employer) directly, actually, and immediately exercises significant control over the essential terms and conditions of those employees' work, such as hiring them, firing them, setting their pay or benefits, supervising them day to day, assigning their work schedule, position, or tasks, or disciplining them. Under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, an employer could be treated as a joint employer of another employer's employees for purposes of that Act only if both employers meet that same standard, except that the terms 'employee' and 'employer' used in the standard would carry the meanings given to them under the Fair Labor Standards Act rather than under the National Labor Relations Act when joint-employer status is being decided under the Fair Labor Standards Act.

Show official text
Official text, verbatim from the record

2. Clarification of joint employment (a) National Labor Relations Act Section 2(2) of the National Labor Relations Act ( 29 U.S.C. 152(2) ) is amended— (1) by striking The term employer and inserting (A) The term employer ; and (2) by adding at the end the following: (B) An employer may be considered a joint employer of the employees of another employer only if each employer directly, actually, and immediately, exercises significant control over the essential terms and conditions of employment of the employees of the other employer, such as hiring such employees, discharging such employees, determining the rate of pay and benefits of such employees, supervising such employees on a day-to-day basis, assigning such employees a work schedule, position, or task, or disciplining such employees. . (b) Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 Section 3(d) of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 ( 29 U.S.C. 203(d) ) is amended— (1) by striking Employer includes and inserting (1) Employer includes ; and (2) by adding at the end the following: (2) An employer may be considered a joint employer of the employees of another employer for purposes of this Act only if each employer meets the criteria set forth in section 2(2)(B) of the National Labor Relations Act ( 29 U.S.C. 152(2)(B) ) except that, for purposes of determining joint-employer status under this Act, the terms employee and employer referenced in such section shall have the meanings given such terms in this section. .

AI plain languageRead the whole bill in plain language, 2 sections

Where it is

Introduced · 2025-07-14

In the House.

Passed the House · 2026-01-13
Senate floor vote · next · the next step

Official documents

The on-site text is shown verbatim from the GovInfo publication, captured 2026-07-23. The same version at GovInfo.

The numbers

29%
of bills that passed one chamber became law in the 118th Congress, 2023 to 2024 (n=939)
3
sponsors, out of 218 needed to pass

Who is lobbying on this

ENBRIDGE (U.S.) INCvia ENBRIDGE (U.S.) INC
7 filings
BABCOCK & WILCOX ENTERPRISES, INC.via ELEVATE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, LLC
6 filings
BERING STRAITS NATIVE CORPORATIONvia BLANK ROME GOVERNMENT RELATIONS
6 filings
CITY OF HILLSBOROvia ELEVATE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, LLC
6 filings
FEDEX CORPORATIONvia FEDEX CORPORATION
6 filings
SAN DIEGO COUNTY REGIONAL AIRPORT AUTHORITYvia ELEVATE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, LLC
6 filings
AFL-CIOvia AFL-CIO
4 filings
AMERICAN HOTEL & LODGING ASSOCIATIONvia AMERICAN HOTEL & LODGING ASSOCIATION
4 filings
From 161 filings in federal lobbying disclosures (LDA), via lda.gov, naming this bill (2025 to 2026). Filings are self-reported by lobbying firms and show who is paid to influence this bill. They do not say which side, or whether it worked.
Every fact on this page links to its source, starting with the official bill record. Last action: Rule H. Res. 988 passed House. (2026-01-13).