govt.fyi
US Congress · H.R. 3073 · Passed the House

Shivwits Band of Paiutes Jurisdictional Clarity Act

Introduced
Moved
Reached a final decision
Introduced 2025-04-29
Derived from the official record below.

Officially: “Shivwits Band of Paiutes Jurisdictional Clarity Act Read the full text

Native Americans

What it does

Shivwits Band of Paiutes Jurisdictional Clarity Act This bill confers legal jurisdiction to the State of Utah over certain civil cases involving the Shivwits Band of Paiutes. It also allows the tribe to lease its land held in trust. The tribe is located in southwestern Utah. Specifically, the bill confers jurisdiction to the State of Utah over any civil cause of action (1) to which the Shivwits Band of Paiutes is a party, and (2) that arises on or within Indian lands. Under the bill, Indian lands are lands of the tribe that are (1) held in trust for the benefit of the tribe, or (2) subject to
Summary by the Congressional Research Service, from the official record. Plain-language version below. Not legal advice.

Read it in plain language

AI plain language6 sections
Written by AI from the complete official bill text and independently fact-checked against it. Not legal advice.
1Short title

This section says the Act's short title is the Shivwits Band of Paiutes Jurisdictional Clarity Act.

Show official text
Official text, verbatim from the record

1. Short title This Act may be cited as the Shivwits Band of Paiutes Jurisdictional Clarity Act .

2Definitions

This section defines two terms used throughout the Act. "Indian lands" means land of the Shivwits Band of Paiutes that is either held in trust by the United States for the tribe's benefit or subject to a restriction against alienation imposed by the United States. "Shivwits Band of Paiutes" means the Shivwits Band of Paiutes itself, a federally recognized Indian tribe restored by Congress under the Paiute Indian Tribe of Utah Restoration Act (Public Law 96-227; 94 Stat. 317); the tribe's recognized governing body; any Shivwits tribal enterprise, including any commercial activity, business, or entity that the tribe manages, controls, or operates, and any subsidiaries of those enterprises; and any corporation the tribe has chartered under section 17 of the Indian Reorganization Act (25 U.S.C. 5124), and any subsidiaries of that corporation.

Show official text
Official text, verbatim from the record

2. Definitions In this Act: (1) Indian lands The term Indian lands means lands of the Shivwits Band of Paiutes that are— (A) held in trust by the United States for the benefit of the Shivwits Band of Paiutes; or (B) subject to a restriction against alienation imposed by the United States. (2) Shivwits Band of Paiutes The term Shivwits Band of Paiutes means— (A) the Shivwits Band of Paiutes, a federally recognized Indian Tribe restored by Congress pursuant to the Paiute Indian Tribe of Utah Restoration Act ( Public Law 96–227 ; 94. Stat. 317); (B) the recognized governing body of the Shivwits Band of Paiutes; (C) any Shivwits Tribal enterprise, including any commercial activity, business, or entity managed, controlled, or operated by the Shivwits Band of Paiutes, and any subsidiaries thereto; and (D) any corporation chartered by the Shivwits Band of Paiutes under section 17 of the Act of June 18, 1934 (commonly known as the Indian Reorganization Act ) (48 Stat. 988, chapter 576; 25 U.S.C. 5124 ), and any subsidiaries thereto.

3State civil jurisdiction

This section would give the State of Utah jurisdiction over a civil cause of action if the Shivwits Band of Paiutes is a party to it and the cause of action arises on or within the Indian lands. Both conditions must be met for Utah to have this jurisdiction.

Show official text
Official text, verbatim from the record

3. State civil jurisdiction The State of Utah shall have jurisdiction over any civil cause of action— (1) to which the Shivwits Band of Paiutes is a party; and (2) that arises on or within the Indian lands.

4Federal court jurisdiction

This section has two parts. First, any contract or agreement, including a lease, that affects or arises on the Indian lands, or to which the Shivwits Band of Paiutes is a party, would count as "commerce" as that term is defined in section 1 of title 9 of the United States Code, the federal arbitration law. Second, any cause of action arising from such a contract or agreement, including a lease, that affects or arises on the Indian lands, or to which the Shivwits Band of Paiutes is a party, would be treated as a civil cause of action arising under the Constitution, laws, or treaties of the United States for purposes of section 1331 of title 28 of the United States Code, the statute that lets federal district courts hear federal question cases.

Show official text
Official text, verbatim from the record

4. Federal court jurisdiction (a) In general Any contract or agreement, including a lease, affecting or arising on the Indian lands, or to which the Shivwits Band of Paiutes is a party, shall be considered within the meaning of commerce as defined in section 1 of title 9, United States Code. (b) Causes of action Any cause of action arising from any contract or agreement, including a lease, affecting or arising on the Indian lands, or to which the Shivwits Band of Paiutes is a party, shall be deemed to be a civil cause of action arising under the Constitution, laws, or treaties of the United States within the meaning of section 1331 of title 28, United States Code.

5Sovereign immunity not abrogated

This section states that nothing in the Act takes away the Shivwits Band of Paiutes' sovereign immunity from lawsuits it has not consented to, and nothing in the Act takes away the tribe's authority to waive that immunity if it chooses to.

Show official text
Official text, verbatim from the record

5. Sovereign immunity not abrogated Nothing in this Act abrogates— (1) the sovereign immunity of the Shivwits Band of Paiutes from unconsented suit; or (2) the authority of the Shivwits Band of Paiutes to waive that sovereign immunity. 6. Shivwits Band of Paiutes leasing authority Subsection (a) of the first section of the Act of August 9, 1955 (69 Stat. 539, chapter 615; 25 U.S.C. 415(a) ), is amended, in the second sentence, by inserting , land held in trust for the Shivwits Band of Paiutes after land held in trust for the Confederated Tribes of the Chehalis Reservation .

6Shivwits Band of Paiutes leasing authority
This section would insert the phrase "land held in trust for the Shivwits Band of Paiutes" into the second sentence of subsection (a) of the Act of August 9, 1955 (25 U.S.C. 415(a)), right after the existing reference to "land held in trust for the Confederated Tribes of the Chehalis Reservation." The edit is purely additive, adding the Shivwits Band of Paiutes to a list of tribes named in that sentence. The provided bill text does not include the text of 25 U.S.C. 415(a) itself, so the substantive leasing terms that sentence grants (such as permitted lease purposes or maximum lease length) cannot be stated here.
AI plain languageRead the whole bill in plain language, 6 sections

Where it is

Introduced · 2025-04-29

In the House.

Committee hearing · 2025-05-20
Passed the House · 2026-03-16
Senate floor vote · next · the next step

Official documents

The on-site text is shown verbatim from the GovInfo publication, captured 2026-07-23. The same version at GovInfo.

The numbers

29%
of bills that passed one chamber became law in the 118th Congress, 2023 to 2024 (n=939)
3
sponsors, out of 218 needed to pass

Who is lobbying on this

CITY OF SANTA CLARAvia CITY OF SANTA CLARA
2 filings
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SOCIAL WORKERSvia NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SOCIAL WORKERS
1 filing
From 3 filings in federal lobbying disclosures (LDA), via lda.gov, naming this bill (2025 to 2026). Filings are self-reported by lobbying firms and show who is paid to influence this bill. They do not say which side, or whether it worked.
Every fact on this page links to its source, starting with the official bill record. Last action: Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Indian Affairs. (2026-03-17).