govt.fyi
US Congress · H.R. 1001 · Passed the House

To provide for a memorandum of understanding to address the impacts of a certain record of decision on the Upper Colorado River...

Introduced
Moved
Reached a final decision
Introduced 2025-02-05
Derived from the official record below.

Officially: “To provide for a memorandum of understanding to address the impacts of a certain record of decision on the Upper Colorado River Basin Fund. Read the full text

Water Resources Development

What it does

This bill directs the Bureau of Reclamation and the Western Area Power Administration, in consultation with the Glen Canyon Dam Adaptive Management Work Group, to enter into a memorandum of understanding to explore and address the impact that the 2024 record of decision entitled Supplement to the 2016 Glen Canyon Dam Long-Term Experimental and Management Plan Record of Decision has on the Upper Colorado River Basin Fund. The memorandum of understanding must include a plan to (1) address the effects that the decision may have on the fund's obligations, (2) address the impact that the decision h
Summary by the Congressional Research Service, from the official record. Plain-language version below. Not legal advice.

Read it in plain language

AI plain language1 section
Written by AI from the complete official bill text and independently fact-checked against it. Not legal advice.
Sec. 1Memorandum of understanding to address potential impacts of a certain record of decision on the Upper Colorado River Basin Fund

This section would require the Secretary of the Interior, acting through the Commissioner of Reclamation, and the Secretary of Energy, acting through the Administrator of the Western Area Power Administration, in consultation with the Glen Canyon Dam Adaptive Management Work Group, to enter into a memorandum of understanding as soon as practicable after this Act becomes law. The memorandum would have to explore and address the impact that a specific record of decision, the Supplement to the 2016 Glen Canyon Dam Long-Term Experimental and Management Plan Record of Decision dated July 2024, has on the Upper Colorado River Basin Fund. Using information drawn from existing hydropower contracts, the memorandum would have to include a plan covering three things: first, the effects the record of decision may have on the Fund's obligations, including routine operations, maintenance, and replacement of critical infrastructure; second, the impact the record of decision has on hydropower production at Glen Canyon Dam, including costs to replace hydropower resources and grid reliability; and third, the impacts the record of decision has had on species listed as threatened or endangered under section 4 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973. The section also states that nothing in this Act would preempt rights or obligations under the Administrative Procedure Act.

Show official text
Official text, verbatim from the record

1. Memorandum of understanding to address potential impacts of a certain record of decision on the Upper Colorado River Basin Fund (a) In general As soon as practicable after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of the Interior, acting through the Commissioner of Reclamation, and the Secretary of Energy, acting through the Administrator of the Western Area Power Administration, in consultation with the Glen Canyon Dam Adaptive Management Work Group, shall enter into a memorandum of understanding to explore and address the impact that the record of decision entitled the Supplement to the 2016 Glen Canyon Dam Long-Term Experimental and Management Plan Record of Decision and dated July 2024 (referred to in this section as the record of decision ) has on the Upper Colorado River Basin Fund (referred to in this section as the Fund ). (b) Required plan The memorandum of understanding entered into under subsection (a) shall, using information derived from existing hydropower contracts, include the establishment of a plan to— (1) address the effects that the record of decision may have on Fund obligations including routine operations, maintenance, and replacement of critical infrastructure; (2) address the impact that the record of decision has on hydropower production at Glen Canyon Dam, including costs to replace hydropower resources and grid reliability; and (3) identify impacts that the record of decision has had on species listed as a threatened species or an endangered species under section 4 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 ( 16 U.S.C. 1533 ). (c) Savings clauses Nothing in this Act shall preempt rights or obligations under subchapter II of chapter 5 of title 5, United States Code (commonly referred to as the Administrative Procedure Act ).

AI plain languageRead the whole bill in plain language, 1 section

Where it is

Introduced · 2025-02-05

In the House.

Passed the House · 2025-05-13
Senate floor vote · next · the next step

Official documents

The on-site text is shown verbatim from the GovInfo publication, captured 2026-07-23. The same version at GovInfo.

The numbers

29%
of bills that passed one chamber became law in the 118th Congress, 2023 to 2024 (n=939)
3
sponsors, out of 218 needed to pass

Who is lobbying on this

COLORADO RIVER ENERGY DISTRIBUTORS ASSOCIATIONvia MEGUIRE WHITNEY
6 filings
NATIONAL RURAL ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATION (NRECA)via NATIONAL RURAL ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATION (NRECA)
6 filings
UTAH ASSOCIATED MUNICIPAL POWER SYSTEMSvia MEGUIRE WHITNEY
2 filings
AMERICAN PUBLIC POWER ASSOCIATIONvia AMERICAN PUBLIC POWER ASSOCIATION
1 filing
From 15 filings in federal lobbying disclosures (LDA), via lda.gov, naming this bill (2025 to 2026). Filings are self-reported by lobbying firms and show who is paid to influence this bill. They do not say which side, or whether it worked.
Every fact on this page links to its source, starting with the official bill record. Last action: Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. (2025-05-14).