govt.fyi
Back to SB 506
Texas Legislature· SB 506Effective on 9/1/25

Relating to requirements for certain ballot propositions and to related procedures and provisions, the official text

Shown verbatim: the complete text as captured from the official page posted by the Texas Legislature, fetched 2026-08-29. Where this bill amends existing law, language marked for deletion in the official page appears here in brackets. This is the enrolled version. The official bill page.
S.B. No. 506

AN ACT

relating to requirements for certain ballot propositions and to

related procedures and provisions.

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:

SECTION 1. Section 52.072, Election Code, is amended by

adding Subsection (g) to read as follows:

(g) A proposition must substantially submit the question

with such definiteness, certainty, and facial neutrality that the

voters are not misled.

SECTION 2. Chapter 233, Election Code, is amended by adding

Section 233.0115 to read as follows:

Sec. 233.0115. BALLOT LANGUAGE MANDAMUS ACTION. If a court

orders a new election under Section 233.011, a person may seek from

the court a writ of mandamus to compel the governing body of a city

to comply with the requirement that a ballot proposition must

substantially submit the question with such definiteness,

certainty, and facial neutrality that the voters are not misled, as

provided by Section 273.102.

SECTION 3. Chapter 273, Election Code, is amended by adding

Subchapter F to read as follows:

SUBCHAPTER F. BALLOT PROPOSITION LANGUAGE ENFORCEMENT PROVISIONS

Sec. 273.101. REVIEW BY SECRETARY OF STATE. (a) Not later

than the seventh day after the date on which a home-rule city

publishes in the election order ballot proposition language

proposing an amendment to the city charter or a voter-initiated

initiative or referendum as requested by petition, a registered

voter eligible to vote in the election or an authorized

representative of a home-rule city may submit the proposition for

review by the secretary of state.

(b) The secretary of state shall review the proposition not

later than the seventh day after the date the secretary receives the

submission to determine whether the proposition is misleading,

inaccurate, or prejudicial.

(c) If the secretary of state determines that the

proposition is misleading, inaccurate, or prejudicial, the

secretary of state shall provide notice to the city of the secretary

of state's determination. Not later than the third day after

receiving notice from the secretary of state, the city shall draft a

proposition to cure the defects and give notice of the new

proposition using the method of giving notice prescribed for notice

of an election under Section 4.003.

(d) A proposition drafted by a city under Subsection (c) to

cure the defects may be submitted to the secretary of state under

Subsection (a). If the secretary of state determines that the city

has drafted a proposition under Subsection (c) that is misleading,

inaccurate, or prejudicial, the secretary of state shall draft the

ballot proposition.

Sec. 273.102. MANDAMUS ACTIONS. (a) In an action in a

court of competent jurisdiction seeking a writ of mandamus to

compel the city's governing body to comply with the requirement

that a ballot proposition must substantially submit the question

with such definiteness, certainty, and facial neutrality that the

voters are not misled, the court shall make its determination

without delay and may order the city to use ballot proposition

language drafted by the court.

(b) Except as provided by Subsection (d), the court may

award a plaintiff or relator who substantially prevails in a

mandamus action described by Subsection (a) the party's reasonable

attorney's fees, expenses, and court costs.

(c) Governmental immunity to suit is waived and abolished

only to the extent of the liability created by Subsection (b).

(d) If, pursuant to Section 273.101, the secretary of state

determines that a proposition is not misleading, inaccurate, or

prejudicial, or drafts the ballot proposition language, a plaintiff

or relator who prevails in a mandamus action described by

Subsection (a) may not be awarded the party's reasonable attorney's

fees, expenses, or court costs.

Sec. 273.103. MANDATORY SUBMISSION TO SECRETARY OF STATE.

Following a final nonappealable judgment containing a finding by a

court that a ballot proposition drafted by a city failed to

substantially submit the question with such definiteness,

certainty, and facial neutrality that the voters are not misled,

the city shall submit to the secretary of state for approval any

proposition to be voted on at an election held by the city before

the fourth anniversary of the court's finding.

Sec. 273.104. CITY REQUIRED TO PAY FOR LEGAL SERVICES.

Notwithstanding a home-rule city charter provision to the contrary,

a city may not accept legal services relating to a proceeding under

this subchapter without paying fair market value for those

services.

SECTION 4. Chapter 277, Election Code, is amended by adding

Section 277.005 to read as follows:

Sec. 277.005. OBSTRUCTION OF PETITION-INITIATED ELECTION

PROHIBITED. (a) A political subdivision may not propose a measure,

including a charter amendment, that will appear on the same ballot

as a petition-initiated measure if:

(1) the two measures generally address the same

subject matter; or

(2) a provision of a proposed measure would invalidate

or conflict with any portion of a petition-initiated measure.

(b) A measure proposed by a political subdivision in

violation of this section is void if the measure is proposed not

earlier than the 180th day before the date the political

subdivision's secretary receives the petition under this chapter.

A political subdivision may be enjoined from proposing the measure.

SECTION 5. The changes in law made by this Act apply only to

a petition submitted on or after January 1, 2026.

SECTION 6. This Act takes effect September 1, 2025.

______________________________
______________________________

President of the Senate
Speaker of the House

I hereby certify that S.B. No. 506 passed the Senate on

April 30, 2025, by the following vote: Yeas 23, Nays 8; and that

the Senate concurred in House amendments on May 30, 2025, by the

following vote: Yeas 24, Nays 7.

______________________________

Secretary of the Senate

I hereby certify that S.B. No. 506 passed the House, with

amendments, on May 28, 2025, by the following vote: Yeas 102,

Nays 37, one present not voting.

______________________________

Chief Clerk of the House

Approved:

______________________________

Date

______________________________

Governor
Every fact on this page links to its source, starting with the official bill record.