govt.fyi
Back to SB 1583
Oklahoma Legislature· SB 1583Second Reading referred to Judiciary

An act relating to voting rights, the official text

Shown verbatim: the complete text as captured from the official PDF posted by the Oklahoma Legislature, fetched 2026-07-23. Page and line markers are part of the official record; nothing is edited or removed. The official bill page.
1                            STATE OF OKLAHOMA

1

2                  2nd Session of the 60th Legislature (2026)

2

3 SENATE BILL 1583           By: Kirt
3

4

4

5

5

6                            AS INTRODUCED

6

7   An Act relating to voting rights; creating the

7   Oklahoma Voting Rights Act; providing short title;

8   providing legislative findings; defining terms;

8   prohibiting voter suppression and dilution; providing

9   for violations; providing relevant factors for

9   determining violations; prohibiting certain factors

10  for determining violations; requiring pre-suit notice

10  in certain circumstances; providing for

11  responsibilities of parties; providing for approval

11  of certain remedies with court approval; providing

12  for cost sharing; providing right of action;

12  permitting preliminary relief in certain

13  circumstances; providing for award of attorney fees;

13  construing provisions; providing for noncodification;

14  providing for codification; and providing an

14  effective date.

15

15

16

16

17 BE IT ENACTED BY THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA:
17

18  SECTION 1.      NEW LAW  A new section of law not to be

18

19 codified in the Oklahoma Statutes reads as follows:
19

20  This act shall be known and may be cited as the "Oklahoma Voting

20

21 Rights Act".
21

22  SECTION 2.      NEW LAW  A new section of law not to be

22

23 codified in the Oklahoma Statutes reads as follows:
23

24

24

    Req. No. 3260                                              Page 1
1   The Legislature finds that election practices, procedures, and

1

2 methods that deny or impair the equal opportunity of racial, color,
2

3 or language minority groups and Tribal communities to participate in
3

4 the political process or elect candidates of their choice are
4

5 inconsistent with the fundamental right to vote, and the rights and
5

6 privileges guaranteed by the Oklahoma Constitution and the
6

7 protections found in the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments to the
7

8 United States Constitution.
8

9   The Legislature also finds that there is a history in this state

9

10 and the United States overall of discrimination based on race,
10

11 color, language-minority status, and Tribal membership, including in
11

12 access to the political process. As a result of this history and
12

13 persistent discrimination and socioeconomic inequities that bear on
13

14 the right to vote, members of racial, color, or language minority
14

15 groups and Tribal communities continue to face unequal barriers in
15

16 exercising the franchise and participating effectively in the
16

17 political process. In light of these conditions, it is the
17

18 Legislature's intent by this act to encourage participation in the
18

19 elective franchise by all eligible voters and to provide voters in
19

20 this state with a means to secure their constitutional right to vote
20

21 free from discrimination.
21

22  SECTION 3.     NEW LAW     A new section of law to be codified

22

23 in the Oklahoma Statutes as Section 23-100 of Title 26, unless there
23

24 is created a duplication in numbering, reads as follows:
24

    Req. No. 3260                                              Page 2
1   A. As used in this section:

1

2   1. "Alternative method of election" means a method of electing

2

3 candidates to the legislative body of a political subdivision other
3

4 than an at-large method of election or a district-based method of
4

5 election including, but not limited to, cumulative voting, limited
5

6 voting, and proportional ranked choice voting;
6

7   2. "At-large method of election" means a method of electing

7

8 candidates to the legislative body of a political subdivision in
8

9 which candidates are voted on by all voters of the political
9

10 subdivision or that combines at-large with district-based methods of
10

11 elections. At-large method of election does not include any
11

12 alternative method of election;
12

13  3. "District-based method of election" means a method of

13

14 electing candidates to the legislative body of a political
14

15 subdivision in which, for political subdivisions divided into
15

16 districts, a candidate for any district is required to reside in the
16

17 district and candidates representing or seeking to represent the
17

18 district are voted on by only the voters who reside in the district.
18

19 District-based method of election does not include any alternative
19

20 method of election;
20

21  4. "Government official" means any individual who is elected or

21

22 appointed to an office in this state or a political subdivision or
22

23 who is authorized to act in an official capacity on behalf of the
23

24 state or a political subdivision;
24

    Req. No. 3260                                              Page 3
1   5. "Language minority group" means a language minority group as

1

2 defined in the federal Voting Rights Act of 1965, as amended, as of
2

3 the effective date of this act;
3

4   6. "Method of election" means the method by which candidates

4

5 are elected to the legislative body of a political subdivision and
5

6 includes at-large method of election, district-based method of
6

7 election, or any alternative method of election. Method of election
7

8 also includes the districting or redistricting plan used to elect
8

9 candidates to the legislative body of a political subdivision;
9

10  7. "Polarized voting" means voting in which the candidate or

10

11 electoral choice preferred by a protected class diverges from the
11

12 candidate or electoral choice preferred by other voters;
12

13  8. "Political subdivision" means a county, city, town, or

13

14 school district;
14

15  9. "Politically cohesive" means that members of a group tend to

15

16 prefer the same candidates, electoral choices, or policies;
16

17  10. "Protected class" means a class of citizens who are members

17

18 of a racial, color, or language minority group, or who are members
18

19 of a federally recognized Indian Tribe, including a class of two or
19

20 more such groups;
20

21  11. "Vote" or "voting" includes any action necessary to cast a

21

22 ballot and make that ballot count in any election including, but not
22

23 limited to, registering to vote, applying for an absentee ballot,
23

24 and any other action required by law as a prerequisite to casting a
24

    Req. No. 3260                                               Page 4
1 ballot and having that ballot counted, canvassed, certified, and
1

2 included in the appropriate totals of votes cast with respect to an
2

3 election; and
3

4   12. "Voting eligible population" means persons who are eligible

4

5 to register and vote in this state, regardless of whether the
5

6 individuals are registered to vote in this state.
6

7   B. Any law, rule, charter provision, local ordinance, or local

7

8 code relating to the right to vote, or which grants authority to
8

9 prescribe or maintain voting or elections policies and practices,
9

10 shall be construed or applied liberally in favor of a voter's
10

11 exercise of the right of suffrage. To the extent a court is
11

12 afforded discretion on an issue including, but not limited to,
12

13 discovery, procedure, admissibility of evidence, or remedies, the
13

14 court shall exercise such discretion and weigh other equitable
14

15 discretion in favor of the right to vote.
15

16  C. No political subdivision or any other government official or

16

17 entity responsible for election administration shall adopt or apply
17

18 a qualification for eligibility to vote or other prerequisite to
18

19 voting; adopt or apply any law, ordinance, rule, standard, practice,
19

20 procedure, or policy regarding the administration of elections; or
20

21 take any other action or fail to take any action that results in, is
21

22 likely to result in, or is intended to result in a denial or
22

23 abridgement of the right to vote by a member of a protected class.
23

24 A violation of this subsection may be established if it is shown
24

    Req. No. 3260                                    Page 5
1 that the challenged qualification, law, ordinance, rule, standard,
1

2 practice, procedure, policy, or action results in a disparate burden
2

3 on members of a protected class and the burden is, under the
3

4 totality of the circumstances, related to social and historical
4

5 conditions affecting members of the protected class.
5

6   D. No political subdivision or any other government official or

6

7 entity responsible for election administration shall adopt or
7

8 enforce any method of election, or cause an annexation,
8

9 incorporation, dissolution, consolidation, or division of a
9

10 political subdivision, that has the effect of impairing the equal
10

11 opportunity or ability of members of a protected class to nominate
11

12 or elect candidates of their choice as a result of diluting the vote
12

13 of members of that protected class.
13

14  1. A violation of this subsection exists when it is shown that

14

15 either:
15

16          a. elections in a political subdivision exhibit polarized

16

17                 voting resulting in an impairment of the equal

17

18                 opportunity or ability of protected class members to

18

19                 nominate or elect candidates of their choice, or

19

20          b. based on the totality of the circumstances, the equal

20

21                 opportunity or ability of protected class members to

21

22                 nominate or elect candidates of their choice is

22

23                 impaired; and

23

24

24

    Req. No. 3260                                              Page 6
1   2. One or more new methods of election or changes to the

1

2 existing method of election exist that the court could order
2

3 pursuant to paragraph 1 of subsection H of Section 23-102 of Title
3

4 26 of the Oklahoma Statutes would likely mitigate the impairment.
4

5   E. To the extent that a new method of election or change to the

5

6 existing method of election that is presented under paragraph 2 of
6

7 subsection D of this section is a proposed district-based plan that
7

8 provides protected class members with one or more reasonably
8

9 configured districts in which the protected class members would have
9

10 an equal opportunity or ability to nominate or elect candidates of
10

11 the protected class members' choice, it is not necessary to show
11

12 that members of a protected class comprise a majority of the total
12

13 population, voting age population, voting eligible population, or
13

14 registered voter population in any such district or districts.
14

15  F. The fact that members of a protected class are not

15

16 geographically compact does not preclude a finding of a violation of
16

17 this section but may be a factor in determining whether an
17

18 appropriate remedy exists that would likely mitigate the impairment.
18

19  G. For claims brought on behalf of a protected class including

19

20 one consisting of two or more racial, color, Tribal, or language
20

21 minority groups that are politically cohesive in the political
21

22 subdivision, the court shall consider only the combined electoral
22

23 preferences of those racial, color, Tribal, or language minority
23

24 groups in determining whether voting by the protected class is
24

    Req. No. 3260                                              Page 7
1 polarized from other voters. It is not necessary to demonstrate
1

2 that voting by members of each racial, color, Tribal, or language
2

3 minority group within a protected class, or by any subgroup within a
3

4 racial, color, or language minority group, is separately polarized
4

5 from other voters.
5

6   H. Evidence concerning the causes of, or the reasons for, the

6

7 occurrence of polarized voting is not relevant to the determination
7

8 of whether polarized voting occurs, or whether candidates or
8

9 electoral choices preferred by a protected class would usually be
9

10 defeated. Evidence concerning alternate explanations for polarized
10

11 voting patterns or election outcomes, including but not limited to
11

12 partisan explanations, shall not be considered. Evidence concerning
12

13 projected changes in population or demographics may only be
13

14 considered when determining whether an appropriate remedy exists
14

15 that would likely mitigate the impairment.
15

16  SECTION 4.         NEW LAW  A new section of law to be codified

16

17 in the Oklahoma Statutes as Section 23-101 of Title 26, unless there
17

18 is created a duplication in numbering, reads as follows:
18

19  A. In determining whether, under the totality of the

19

20 circumstances, a violation of Section 3 of this act has occurred
20

21 with respect to a protected class, a court may consider any of the
21

22 following factors:
22

23  1. The history of discrimination affecting members of the

23

24 protected class;
24

    Req. No. 3260                                               Page 8
1   2. The extent to which members of the protected class are

1

2 disadvantaged, or otherwise bear the effects of past public or
2

3 private discrimination, in any areas that may hinder their ability
3

4 to participate effectively in the political process, including
4

5 education, employment, health, criminal justice, housing,
5

6 transportation, land use, or environmental protection;
6

7   3. Whether members of the protected class vote at a lower rate

7

8 than other voters;
8

9   4. The use of overt or subtle racial appeals in political

9

10 campaigns or by government officials;
10

11  5. The extent to which members of the protected class have been

11

12 elected to office;
12

13  6. The extent to which candidates who are members of the

13

14 protected class have faced barriers with respect to accessing the
14

15 ballot, receiving financial support, or receiving any other support
15

16 for their candidacies for elective office;
16

17  7. The extent to which candidates who are members of a

17

18 protected class face hostility or barriers while campaigning due to
18

19 the protected class membership;
19

20  8. The extent of polarized voting;

20

21  9. The use of any standard, practice, procedure, or policy that

21

22 may enhance the dilutive effects of a challenged method of election;
22

23

23

24

24

    Req. No. 3260                                            Page 9
1   10. The lack of responsiveness by elected officials to the

1

2 particularized needs of protected class members or a community of
2

3 protected class members;
3

4   11. Whether the challenged method of election, ordinance,

4

5 resolution, rule, policy, standard, regulation, procedure, or law
5

6 was designed to advance, and does materially advance, a compelling
6

7 state interest that is substantiated and supported by evidence; and
7

8   12. Any other factor the court may deem relevant.

8

9   B. No one factor in subsection A of this section is dispositive

9

10 or necessary to establish the existence of a violation of Section 3
10

11 of this act, nor shall any specified number or combination of
11

12 factors be required in establishing that such a violation has
12

13 occurred. The court shall consider a particular factor only if and
13

14 to the extent evidence pertaining to that factor is introduced. The
14

15 absence of evidence as to any particular factor does not preclude a
15

16 finding of a violation of Section 3 of this act.
16

17  C. To the extent a claim concerns a political subdivision,

17

18 evidence of the factors in subsection A of this section is most
18

19 probative if the evidence relates to the political subdivision in
19

20 which the alleged violation occurred but still holds probative value
20

21 if the evidence relates to the geographic region in which that
21

22 political subdivision is located or to this state.
22

23  D. Evidence concerning the intent of voters, elected officials,

23

24 or the political subdivision to discriminate against members of a
24

    Req. No. 3260                                      Page 10
1 protected class is not required to find a violation of Section 3 of
1

2 this act.
2

3   E. In determining whether a violation of Section 3 of this act

3

4 has occurred, a court shall not consider any of the following:
4

5   1. The number of protected class members not burdened by the

5

6 challenged qualification, prerequisite, standard, practice, or
6

7 procedure;
7

8   2. The degree to which the challenged qualification,

8

9 prerequisite, standard, practice, or procedure has a long pedigree
9

10 or was in widespread use at some earlier date;
10

11  3. The use of an identical or similar qualification,

11

12 prerequisite, standard, practice, or procedure in other states or
12

13 jurisdictions;
13

14  4. The availability of other forms of voting unimpacted by the

14

15 challenged qualification, prerequisite, standard, practice, or
15

16 procedure to all members of the electorate, including members of the
16

17 protected class;
17

18  5. An impact on potential criminal activity by individual

18

19 voters, if those crimes have not occurred in the political
19

20 subdivision in substantial numbers, or if the connection between the
20

21 challenged policy and any claimed prophylactic effect is not
21

22 supported by substantial evidence; or
22

23  6. Mere invocation of interests in voter confidence or

23

24 prevention of fraud.
24

    Req. No. 3260                                              Page 11
1   SECTION 5.     NEW LAW  A new section of law to be codified

1

2 in the Oklahoma Statutes as Section 23-102 of Title 26, unless there
2

3 is created a duplication in numbering, reads as follows:
3

4   A. Except as provided in this section, before filing an action

4

5 a prospective plaintiff shall send a notice letter to the political
5

6 subdivision identifying the potential violation, the affected
6

7 protected class, and the type of remedy the potential plaintiff
7

8 believes may address the potential violation. The party may not
8

9 file an action related to the violations described in the notice
9

10 letter until its receipt of a written denial by the political
10

11 subdivision or within sixty (60) days of sending the letter,
11

12 whichever is earlier. A notice letter required by this section
12

13 shall identify a potential violation of Section 3 of this act with
13

14 specificity, including whether the prospective plaintiff believes
14

15 the potential violation constitutes voter suppression under
15

16 subsection C of Section 3 of this act, vote dilution under
16

17 subsection D of Section 3 of this act, or both. The letter shall
17

18 include the relevant facts and evidence that the prospective
18

19 plaintiff relied upon when evaluating whether a potential violation
19

20 of Section 3 of this act exists.
20

21  B. Notwithstanding subsection A of this section, a notice

21

22 letter shall not be required if:
22

23  1. The party is seeking preliminary relief with respect to an

23

24 upcoming election in accordance with subsection G of this section;
24

    Req. No. 3260                                              Page 12
1   2. The party is seeking to intervene in or join an existing

1

2 action; or
2

3   3. Following the party's submission of a notice letter, the

3

4 political subdivision enacted a remedy that would not remedy the
4

5 violation identified in the letter.
5

6   C. The political subdivision shall respond in writing to a

6

7 notice letter submitted under subsection A of this section within
7

8 sixty (60) days. If the political subdivision does not deny the
8

9 potential violation, it shall work in good faith with the party that
9

10 submitted the letter to explore and implement any mutually agreed-
10

11 upon remedies to cure the potential violation. If the political
11

12 subdivision adopts a resolution within sixty (60) days of the filing
12

13 of the letter identifying a remedy, affirming its intent to enact
13

14 and implement a remedy, and establishing a timeline and specific
14

15 steps it will take to do so, the political subdivision shall have
15

16 one hundred fifty (150) days from the submission of the letter to
16

17 enact and implement a remedy, during which time the party who sent
17

18 the letter may not file an action related to those violations
18

19 against that political subdivision. A statement, action, or
19

20 decision of a political subdivision under this subsection does not
20

21 constitute an admission by the political subdivision of its
21

22 liability or establish the existence of a violation of Section 3 of
22

23 this act.
23

24

24

    Req. No. 3260                      Page 13
1   D. If the political subdivision lacks authority to enact or

1

2 implement an identified remedy, the political subdivision may
2

3 nonetheless enact and implement the remedy upon approval by the
3

4 district court. To seek approval, the political subdivision shall
4

5 file a petition in district court that identifies with specificity
5

6 the law or other authority that prevents the remedy from being
6

7 enacted or implemented. The venue for a petition under this
7

8 subsection is in the district court of the county where the
8

9 challenged act or practice occurred, or in the District Court of
9

10 Oklahoma County. The district court may authorize the political
10

11 subdivision to implement or enact the identified remedy
11

12 notwithstanding the applicable law or authority to the contrary, if
12

13 the court determines that the prospective plaintiff is likely to
13

14 succeed in a lawsuit on the merits of the alleged violation, that
14

15 the proposed remedy would address the alleged violation, and that
15

16 the proposed remedy is narrowly tailored to that purpose.
16

17  E. If a political subdivision enacts or implements a remedy in

17

18 response to a notice letter submitted under subsection A of this
18

19 section, the political subdivision and the party who sent the notice
19

20 letter shall mutually agree on a reimbursement amount to be paid by
20

21 the political subdivision to that party. The reimbursement amount
21

22 shall reflect the reasonable costs associated with producing and
22

23 sending the letter and any accompanying evidence, subject to the
23

24 limitations of this subsection. To be eligible for a reimbursement,
24

    Req. No. 3260                                             Page 14
1 the party who submitted the notice letter shall submit a request to
1

2 the political subdivision in writing. The request shall be received
2

3 by the political subdivision within thirty (30) days of its
3

4 enactment or adoption of the remedy and be substantiated with
4

5 financial documentation including, as applicable, detailed invoices
5

6 for expert analysis and reasonable attorney fees. The cumulative
6

7 amount of reimbursements to all parties shall not exceed Thirty
7

8 Thousand Dollars ($30,000.00). Reimbursement amounts for attorney
8

9 fees shall be limited to amounts calculated using a lodestar
9

10 methodology.
10

11  F. To the extent a party requests reimbursement for a purported

11

12 notice letter that fails to comply with the requirements in
12

13 subsection A of this section, or the request fails to comply with
13

14 this subsection, the political subdivision may dismiss the request.
14

15 If the request is dismissed, the political subdivision shall notify
15

16 the party in writing of the reasons for the dismissal.
16

17  G. 1. The Attorney General, a district attorney, any

17

18 individual aggrieved by a violation of this act, any entity whose
18

19 membership includes individuals aggrieved by a violation of this
19

20 act, any entity whose mission would be impeded by a violation of
20

21 this act, or any entity that would expend resources in order to
21

22 fulfill its mission as a result of a violation of this act, may file
22

23 an action in the district court for the county where the challenged
23

24 act or practice has occurred, or in the District Court of Oklahoma
24

    Req. No. 3260                                          Page 15
1 County. Actions brought under this act are subject to expedited
1

2 pretrial and trial proceedings and shall receive an automatic
2

3 calendar preference. The state is a necessary party in any action
3

4 in which an alleged violation is based on a political subdivision's
4

5 implementation of a state law, if the state law does not afford
5

6 discretion to the political subdivision in its implementation of the
6

7 law.
7

8   2. In an action related to a districting or redistricting plan,

8

9 any individual with standing to challenge any single district shall
9

10 be deemed to have standing to challenge the districting or
10

11 redistricting plan as a whole.
11

12  3. In any action seeking a temporary injunction or other

12

13 preliminary relief under this act before an election, the court
13

14 shall grant relief if warranted based on the factors considered in
14

15 seeking a temporary injunction or preliminary relief under laws of
15

16 this state, except that if the court determines that it is possible
16

17 to implement appropriate relief that would address an alleged
17

18 violation before an election, such relief shall not be denied on the
18

19 basis that the election is close in time or that the relief could
19

20 result in voter confusion.
20

21  H. 1. Notwithstanding any other law, if the court finds a

21

22 violation of any provision of Section 3 of this act, the court has
22

23 authority to order remedies that are tailored to best mitigate the
23

24 violation. Any remedy ordered by the court shall be constructed
24

    Req. No. 3260                                              Page 16
1 liberally in favor of a voter's exercise of the right of suffrage.
1

2 The court may consider, among others, any remedy that has been
2

3 ordered by a federal court or the court of another state
3

4 jurisdiction, including through a court-approved consent decree or
4

5 settlement adopted in the context of similar facts or to remedy a
5

6 similar violation. The court shall consider remedies proposed by
6

7 any party and may consider remedies proposed by interested
7

8 nonparties. The court may not provide deference or priority to a
8

9 proposed remedy offered by a defendant or political subdivision
9

10 simply because the remedy has been proposed by the defendant or
10

11 political subdivision.
11

12  2. In any action brought under this act, the court, in its

12

13 discretion, may allow the prevailing party costs and reasonable
13

14 attorney fees. If a party prevails on only a portion of their
14

15 action, the court may award costs and attorney fees attributable to
15

16 that portion of the action. If the party against whom the action
16

17 was filed prevails in the action, the court shall not award that
17

18 party any costs or attorney fees unless the court finds the action
18

19 is frivolous.
19

20  SECTION 6. This act shall become effective November 1, 2026.

20

21

21

22  60-2-3260      BLB     1/13/2026 9:20:46 AM

22

23

23

24

24

    Req. No. 3260                                             Page 17
Every fact on this page links to its source, starting with the official bill record.