govt.fyi
Back to SB 1556
Oklahoma Legislature· SB 1556Second Reading referred to Judiciary

An act relating to eminent domain, the official text

Shown verbatim: the complete text as captured from the official PDF posted by the Oklahoma Legislature, fetched 2026-07-23. Page and line markers are part of the official record; nothing is edited or removed. The official bill page.
1                            STATE OF OKLAHOMA

1

2                  2nd Session of the 60th Legislature (2026)

2

3 SENATE BILL 1556           By: Grellner
3

4

4

5

5

6                            AS INTRODUCED

6

7   An Act relating to eminent domain; defining term;

7   establishing standards for judicial review; requiring

8   de novo judicial review of public use and necessity

8   determinations; requiring strict construction of

9   eminent domain statutes; establishing burdens of

9   proof; establishing disclosure requirements;

10  providing for award of costs to prevailing property

10  owners; providing for codification; and providing an

11  effective date.

11

12

12

13

13

14 BE IT ENACTED BY THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA:
14

15  SECTION 1.      NEW LAW  A new section of law to be codified

15

16 in the Oklahoma Statutes as Section 42 of Title 27, unless there is
16

17 created a duplication in numbering, reads as follows:
17

18  A. As used in this section, "de novo judicial review" means an

18

19 independent judicial determination of all legal and factual
19

20 questions relating to public use, necessity, and compliance with
20

21 applicable law, made without any deference to prior findings,
21

22 assertions, conclusions, resolutions, interpretations, or
22

23 declarations by the condemning authority.
23

24

24

    Req. No. 3498                                               Page 1
1   B. Any determination made by a condemning authority regarding

1

2 whether a proposed taking constitutes a lawful public use, whether
2

3 the taking is necessary for that public use, and whether the
3

4 condemnation complies with statutory and constitutional requirements
4

5 shall be subject to de novo judicial review. A court shall strictly
5

6 construe all statutes granting eminent domain in favor of the
6

7 property owner and against the condemning authority. Any ambiguity
7

8 shall be resolved to limit rather than expand the power to condemn
8

9 private property.
9

10  C. In any judicial condemnation proceeding, the owner of an

10

11 interest in property sought to be condemned shall be entitled,
11

12 through the timely filing of an exception to the report of the
12

13 commissioners in such proceeding, to a hearing on the issues of
13

14 public use or necessity of the taking. At any such hearing, the
14

15 condemning authority shall bear the burden of proving by a
15

16 preponderance of the evidence that the proposed taking is for a
16

17 public use authorized by law, and that the property sought to be
17

18 taken is reasonably necessary to accomplish that public use.
18

19 Necessity shall be proven separately for each individual part,
19

20 parcel, or tract of property sought to be taken, and no taking may
20

21 be justified solely by general project necessity. The condemning
21

22 authority shall show by a preponderance of the evidence that no
22

23 feasible alternative route, alignment, design, or non-condemnation
23

24 option exists that would satisfy the public use with less harm to
24

    Req. No. 3498                                              Page 2
1 private property, and that all alternatives have been analyzed in
1

2 good faith using competent engineering, environmental, and financial
2

3 methods. The burden of proof shall remain with the condemning
3

4 authority at all times, and a resolution of necessity from the
4

5 condemning authority shall not, in and of itself, be conclusive or
5

6 sufficient evidence of necessity or lawful public use.
6

7   D. At least sixty (60) days prior to a hearing to show

7

8 necessity, the condemning authority shall provide the property owner
8

9 with all:
9

10  1. Engineering studies, surveys, routing analyses, maps,

10

11 designs, and feasibility reports;
11

12  2. Environmental reviews, assessments, and determinations;

12

13  3. Financial analyses and justifications for the project;

13

14  4. Communications and memoranda relating to routing, necessity,

14

15 or alternatives; and
15

16  5. Internal and external evaluations of project purpose or

16

17 public use.
17

18  E. Property owners invoking their right to a hearing shall have

18

19 a right to conduct any and all discovery, and issue any and all
19

20 subpoenas, authorized under the Oklahoma Discovery Code and the
20

21 Oklahoma Pleading Code. Subject to the Oklahoma Discovery Code,
21

22 discovery disputes shall be resolved in favor of disclosure of
22

23 information to the property owner.
23

24

24

    Req. No. 3498                                         Page 3
1   F. If, upon a hearing on public use or necessity, the

1

2 condemning authority shall fail to establish its right to condemn
2

3 the property, or any part thereof, the property owner shall be
3

4 entitled to an award of the property owners' reasonable attorney
4

5 fees, costs, and expert witness fees, to be taxed and collected as
5

6 costs in a civil action.
6

7   SECTION 2. This act shall become effective November 1, 2026.

7

8

8

9   60-2-3498      BLB      1/12/2026 6:10:47 PM

9

10

10

11

11

12

12

13

13

14

14

15

15

16

16

17

17

18

18

19

19

20

20

21

21

22

22

23

23

24

24

    Req. No. 3498                                          Page 4
Every fact on this page links to its source, starting with the official bill record.