Shown verbatim: the complete text as captured from the official PDF posted by the Oklahoma Legislature, fetched 2026-07-23. Page and line markers are part of the official record; nothing is edited or removed. The official bill page.
1 STATE OF OKLAHOMA
2 1st Session of the 60th Legislature (2025)
3 HOUSE BILL 2016 By: Pae
4
5
6 AS INTRODUCED
7 An Act relating to evidence; amending 12 O.S. 2021,
Section 2702, which relates to testimony by experts;
8 providing for artificial intelligence expert
testimony; amending 12 O.S. 2021, Section 2806, which
9 relates to hearsay; providing for attacking and
supporting creditability of artificial intelligence
10 expert testimony; and providing an effective date.
11
12
13 BE IT ENACTED BY THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA:
14 SECTION 1. AMENDATORY 12 O.S. 2021, Section 2702, is
15 amended to read as follows:
16 Section 2702. A. If scientific, technical or other specialized
17 knowledge will assist the trier of fact to understand the evidence
18 or to determine a fact in issue, a witness qualified as an expert by
19 knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education may testify in
20 the form of an opinion or otherwise, if:
21 1. The testimony is based upon sufficient facts or data;
22 2. The testimony is the product of reliable principles and
23 methods; and
24
Req. No. 11670 Page 1
1 3. The witness has applied the principles and methods reliably
2 to the facts of the case.
3 B. Where the output of a process or system would be subject to
4 subsection A of this section, if testified to by a human witness,
5 the proponent must demonstrate to the court that it is more likely
6 than not that:
7 1. The output will help the trier of fact to understand the
8 evidence or to determine a fact in issue;
9 2. The output is based on sufficient and pertinent inputs and
10 data, and the opponent has reasonable access to those inputs and
11 data;
12 3. The output is the product of reliable principles and
13 methods; and
14 4. The output reflects a reliable application of the principles
15 and methods to the facts of the case, based on the process's or
16 system's demonstrated reliability under circumstances or conditions
17 substantially similar to those in the case.
18 SECTION 2. AMENDATORY 12 O.S. 2021, Section 2806, is
19 amended to read as follows:
20 Section 2806. A. When a hearsay statement, or a statement
21 defined in subparagraph b, c, d or e of paragraph 2 of subsection B
22 of Section 2801 of this title, has been admitted in evidence, the
23 credibility of the declarant may be attacked and, if attacked, may
24 be supported by any evidence which would be admissible for those
Req. No. 11670 Page 2
1 purposes if declarant had testified as a witness. Evidence of a
2 statement or conduct by the declarant at any time, inconsistent with
3 the declarant's hearsay statement, is not subject to any requirement
4 that the declarant may have been afforded an opportunity to deny or
5 explain. If the party against whom a hearsay statement has been
6 admitted calls the declarant as a witness, the party is entitled to
7 examine the declarant on the statement as if under cross-
8 examination.
9 B. When output of a process or system has been admitted in
10 evidence, and would be a hearsay statement if uttered by a human
11 declarant, the output's accuracy may be attacked, and, if attacked,
12 may be supported by any evidence which would be admissible for those
13 purposes if the output had been uttered by a human declarant. The
14 court may admit evidence of the process's or system's inconsistent
15 output, or prior false output where probative of the admitted
16 output's accuracy, for these purposes as well.
17 SECTION 3. This act shall become effective November 1, 2025.
18
19 60-1-11670 AQH 12/10/24
20
21
22
23
24
Req. No. 11670 Page 3Every fact on this page links to its source, starting with the official bill record.