govt.fyi
Back to HB 1693
Oklahoma Legislature· HB 1693Approved by Governor 05/09/2025

An act relating to criminal procedure, the official text

Shown verbatim: the complete text as captured from the official PDF posted by the Oklahoma Legislature, fetched 2026-07-23. Page and line markers are part of the official record; nothing is edited or removed. The official bill page.
1                   STATE OF OKLAHOMA

2            1st Session of the 60th Legislature (2025)

3 HOUSE BILL 1693               By: Worthen

4

5

6                   AS INTRODUCED

7   An Act relating to criminal procedure; amending

    Section 1, Chapter 168, O.S.L. 2022 (22 O.S. Supp.

8   2024, Section 1005.1), which relates to death penalty

    procedures for the mentally incompetent; clarifying

9   evidentiary hearing requirements; specifying time

    limitation for the submission of certain reports;

10  directing wardens to proceed with execution under

    certain circumstances; allowing new execution dates

11  to be set; modifying and establishing procedures for

    persons deemed mentally incompetent to be executed;

12  applying provisions of the Criminal Discovery Code

    where relevant; prohibiting proceedings from being

13  filed under seal; making amendatory provisions

    retroactive; and providing an effective date.

14

15

16 BE IT ENACTED BY THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA:

17  SECTION 1.      AMENDATORY  Section 1, Chapter 168, O.S.L.

18 2022 (22 O.S. Supp. 2024, Section 1005.1), is amended to read as

19 follows:

20  Section 1005.1. A. For purposes of this act, "mentally

21 incompetent to be executed" means that because of a mental condition

22 the person is presently unable to have a rational understanding:

23  1. Of the reason he or she is being executed; and

24

    Req. No. 10672                                          Page 1
1   2. That he or she is to be executed and that execution is

2 imminent.

3   B. There shall be a presumption that a person who has received

4 a judgment of death is mentally competent to be executed.

5   C. If, after the Attorney General files a motion to set an

6 execution date, the person's attorney for the person has good reason

7 to believe that the person may be mentally incompetent to be

8 executed, the attorney may file a motion in the Court of Criminal

9 Appeals setting forth the facts giving rise to the belief that the

10 person may be mentally incompetent to be executed and requesting the

11 court to order that the person be examined for mental competency to

12 be executed.

13  D. A motion alleging that a person is mentally incompetent to

14 be executed shall be filed initially when filing a written response

15 to the motion of the Attorney General to set an execution date. The

16 person shall have seven (7) days from the filing of the motion of

17 the Attorney General to file a response and raise the issue of

18 mental incompetency.

19  E. A motion alleging that a person is mentally incompetent to

20 be executed shall identify the proceeding in which the person was

21 convicted and shall clearly set forth alleged facts in support of

22 the assertion that the person is presently mentally incompetent to

23 be executed. The person shall attach affidavits, records, or other

24 evidence supporting such allegations or shall state a reason for

    Req. No. 10672                                                 Page 2
1 which such items are not attached. The person shall identify any

2 previous proceeding in which the person challenged his or her

3 competency in relation to the conviction and judgment of death

4 including any challenge to the person's competency of the person to

5 be executed, competency to stand trial, or sanity at the time of the

6 offense.

7   F. In the order of the Court of Criminal Appeals setting the

8 execution date, the Court shall remand the issue of mental

9 competency to be executed to the trial court where the person was

10 originally tried and sentenced. Mental competency of a person to be

11 executed shall not be considered unless and until an execution date

12 has been scheduled.

13  G. In addition to the authority set forth in subsection C of

14 Section 1001.1 of Title 22 of the Oklahoma Statutes this title, the

15 Court of Criminal Appeals may issue stays of execution as necessary

16 to permit inquiry into the person's mental competency of the person

17 to be executed.

18  H. On receipt of the remand, the trial court shall hold an

19 evidentiary hearing to determine whether the person has raised a

20 substantial doubt as to the person's competency of the person to be

21 executed. Unless the Court of Criminal Appeals issues a stay of

22 execution, the hearing shall be held and a decision shall be

23 rendered before the scheduled execution date of the person. The

24 Attorney General shall represent the state at the evidentiary

    Req. No. 10672                                                Page 3
1 hearing. If the trial court determines the person has failed to

2 make a substantial showing that he or she is mentally incompetent to

3 be executed, the court shall deny the motion and the execution shall

4 proceed. If the trial court determines the person has made a

5 substantial showing that he or she is mentally incompetent to be

6 executed, the trial court shall order an examination of the person

7 by the Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services or

8 by a qualified forensic examiner designated by the Department of

9 Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services. By filing the motion,

10 the person shall be deemed to consent to submit to an examination as

11 required by this section for the purpose of assessment of mental

12 competency to be executed. In addition, the person waives any claim

13 of privilege with respect to, and consents to the release of, all

14 mental health and medical records relevant to whether the person is

15 mentally incompetent to be executed. If the person refuses to be

16 examined by the state's expert of the state, the trial court shall

17 not consider any expert evidence offered by the person concerning

18 his or her competency.

19  I. The qualified forensic examiner or examiners shall receive

20 instructions to examine the person to determine whether the person

21 has a rational understanding:

22  1. Of the reason he or she is being executed; and

23  2. That he or she is to be executed and that execution is

24 imminent.

    Req. No. 10672                                              Page 4
1   J. Within a time ordered by the trial court not to exceed

2 forty-five (45) days, the qualified forensic examiner or examiners

3 shall provide copies of their reports to the attorney representing

4 the state, the attorney representing the person, and the trial

5 court.

6   K. After all examinations are complete, the trial court shall

7 conduct a hearing within thirty (30) days to determine whether the

8 person is mentally competent to be executed. The person shall

9 overcome the presumption that he or she is competent to be executed

10 by a preponderance of the evidence.

11  L. If the trial court finds that the person is competent to be

12 executed, the warden shall proceed to execute the judgment as

13 certified in the warrant. If the prior execution date has expired

14 or the Court of Criminal Appeals has issued a stay, a new execution

15 date shall be set as provide in subsection F of Section 1001.1 of

16 this title.

17  M. If the trial court finds that the person is mentally

18 incompetent to be executed, the following procedures shall be

19 followed:

20  1. The trial court shall issue notice to the Court of Criminal

21 Appeals of such findings at which time the Court of Criminal Appeals

22 shall issue a stay of execution if one has not already been entered.

23 Upon issuance of such stay, the trial court shall order that the

24 inmate be reexamined after a reasonable period, not to exceed four

    Req. No. 10672                                                Page 5
1 (4) months, by a qualified forensic examiner or examiners as

2 necessary to determine whether the person remains mentally

3 incompetent to be executed. If the trial court finds that the

4 person is competent to be executed, the warden shall proceed to

5 execute the judgment as certified in the warrant.

6   M. If a person is found to be mentally incompetent to be

7 executed,

8   2. The trial court shall also order the Department of Mental

9 Health and Substance Abuse Services shall to determine through

10 consultation with the Department of Corrections, the place for the

11 person to be held for safe confinement until his or her competency

12 is restored.

13  3. The trial court shall further order the Department of Mental

14 Health and Substance Abuse Services to provide treatment, therapy,

15 or training for the person to achieve competency. The Department of

16 Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services may designate an entity

17 with qualified personnel to provide competency restoration services

18 on behalf of the Department. Competency restoration services shall

19 begin within no more than thirty (30) days after the order issued by

20 the trial court.

21  N. If a person is determined by

22  4. The Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse

23 Services, or a qualified forensic examiner or examiners to have

24 regained his or her designated by the Department, shall reevaluate

    Req. No. 10672                                                  Page 6
1 the mental competency, the state shall file a motion to determine

2 mental of the person to be executed no more than four (4) months

3 after competency to be heard by the trial court where the person was

4 originally tried restoration services have commenced. A copy of the

5 report following reevaluation shall be provided to the attorney

6 representing the state, the attorney representing the person, and

7 the trial court. If the qualified forensic examiner finds the

8 person to be mentally competent to be executed, the trial court

9 shall hold a hearing to determine whether the person is mentally

10 competent to be executed within forty-five (45) days after receipt

11 of the report. The state must overcome by competent evidence a

12 rebuttable presumption of continued incompetence.

13  5. After such hearing, if the person is found to be mentally

14 competent to be executed, the trial court shall notify the Court of

15 Criminal Appeals which shall vacate the stay of execution. The

16 warden shall proceed to execute the judgment as certified in the

17 warrant. If the prior execution date has expired, a new execution

18 date shall be set as provided in subsection F of Section 1001.1 of

19 Title 22 of the Oklahoma Statutes this title.

20  6. If the trial court determines that the person remains

21 mentally incompetent to be executed, the trial court shall enter an

22 order directing the Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse

23 Services to continue to provide treatment, therapy, or training for

24 the person to achieve competency. The Department may designate an

    Req. No. 10672                                                 Page 7
1 entity with qualified personnel to provide competency restoration

2 services on behalf of the Department.

3   7. The entity providing competency restoration services shall

4 monitor the progress of the person and immediately provide written

5 notification to the attorney representing the state, the attorney

6 representing the person, and the trial court if it appears the

7 person facing execution may have regained mental competency to be

8 executed. Upon receipt of such notice, the trial court shall order

9 the Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services, or a

10 qualified forensic examiner designated by the Department, to

11 immediately reevaluate the mental competency of the person to be

12 executed and submit a report within thirty (30) days of the order.

13 The trial court shall then schedule an evidentiary hearing, to be

14 held within thirty (30) days, to determine whether the person is

15 mentally competent to be executed. The state must overcome by

16 competent evidence a rebuttable presumption of continued

17 incompetence.

18  8. After the hearing, if the person is found to be mentally

19 competent to be executed, the trial court shall notify the Court of

20 Criminal Appeals which shall vacate the stay of execution. The

21 warden shall proceed to execute the judgment as certified in the

22 warrant. If the prior execution date has expired, a new execution

23 date shall be set as provided in subsection F of Section 1001.1 of

24 this title.

    Req. No. 10672                                                 Page 8
1   9. If the person is found not mentally competent to be

2 executed, restoration services shall continue as provided in

3 paragraphs 3 and 4 of this subsection. The entity providing

4 competency restoration services shall prepare periodic reports,

5 every six (6) months, indicating what services are being provided

6 and the response of the person, if any, to treatment. These reports

7 shall be provided to the attorney representing the state, the

8 attorney representing the person, and the trial court. The entity

9 providing competency restoration services shall be under a

10 continuing duty to comply with the provisions of paragraph 7 of this

11 subsection.

12  N. The provisions of the Criminal Discovery Code, Section 2002

13 of this title, shall apply, as relevant, to evidentiary hearings

14 conducted under the provisions of this section.

15  O. If any intervening change in the mental competency of the

16 person to be executed occurs after the seven (7) day deadline to

17 initiate proceedings required pursuant to subsection D of this

18 section, the person may file a motion alleging he or she is mentally

19 incompetent to be executed with the Court of Criminal Appeals. An

20 intervening change shall be a condition that has not and could not

21 have been presented in a timely motion because the factual basis for

22 the claim was not ascertainable through the exercise of reasonable

23 diligence. If the Court of Criminal Appeals determines that an

24

    Req. No. 10672                                                 Page 9
1 intervening change has occurred, the procedures set forth in this

2 section shall apply.

3   P. Any filing made pursuant to this section shall be made in

4 good faith as provided in Rule 9.7(C), Rules of the Court of

5 Criminal Appeals, of this title, Ch. 18, App.

6   Q. No portion of the record in proceedings under the provisions

7 of this section shall be filed under seal.

8   R. Upon the effective date of this act, any amendments made to

9 the provisions of this section shall be applied retroactively.

10  SECTION 2. This act shall become effective November 1, 2025.

11

12  60-1-10672      GRS  01/01/25

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

    Req. No. 10672                                                Page 10
Every fact on this page links to its source, starting with the official bill record.