Shown verbatim: the complete text as captured from the official PDF posted by the Oklahoma Legislature, fetched 2026-07-23. Page and line markers are part of the official record; nothing is edited or removed. The official bill page.
1 STATE OF OKLAHOMA
2 1st Session of the 60th Legislature (2025)
3 HOUSE BILL 1593 By: George
4
5
6 AS INTRODUCED
7 An Act relating to criminal procedures; defining
terms; providing guidelines when evaluating the
8 credibility of peace officers; authorizing peace
officers to dispute reports of misconduct; directing
9 the Office of the Attorney General to refer petitions
to an administrative law judge; directing
10 administrative law judge to find in favor of the
peace officer under certain circumstances;
11 prohibiting reliance on allegations of misconduct
upon certain finding by the administrative law judge;
12 providing copy of findings of fact and conclusions of
law to the court; allowing for the disclosure of
13 credibility issues to the court; providing for
codification; and providing an effective date.
14
15
16 BE IT ENACTED BY THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA:
17 SECTION 1. NEW LAW A new section of law to be codified
18 in the Oklahoma Statutes as Section 39.1 of Title 22, unless there
19 is created a duplication in numbering, reads as follows:
20 A. As used in this section:
21 1. "Attorney representing the state" means an attorney
22 authorized by law to represent the state in a criminal case
23 including, but not limited to, a district attorney or city or
24 municipal attorney; and
Req. No. 10029 Page 1
1 2. "Law enforcement agency" means an agency of the state or an
2 agency of a political subdivision of the state authorized by law to
3 employ peace officers.
4 B. When evaluating the credibility of a peace officer who is
5 serving or will serve as a witness in a criminal proceeding, the
6 attorney representing the state may not disqualify the peace officer
7 as a witness on the basis of an allegation of misconduct by the
8 peace officer that has not been finally adjudicated as sustained.
9 C. For purposes of this section, an allegation of misconduct by
10 a peace officer is not considered finally adjudicated as sustained
11 if the allegation is under appeal through an administrative process
12 or judicial proceeding.
13 D. A peace officer who:
14 1. Is the subject of an allegation of misconduct reported by a
15 law enforcement agency to an attorney representing the state;
16 2. Has been notified of a determination by an attorney
17 representing the state that the peace officer is not considered
18 credible to testify in a criminal proceeding as a result of an
19 allegation of misconduct; or
20 3. Has his or her name placed on a "Do Not Call" list of
21 noncredible peace officers by a law enforcement agency or an
22 attorney representing the state, may dispute the report,
23 determination, or listing by filing a petition with the Office of
24 the Attorney General for the purpose of contesting said allegation,
Req. No. 10029 Page 2
1 determination, listing, or other similar action that adversely
2 reflects on the credibility of the peace officer. Upon request by
3 the affected peace officer, the attorney representing the state or
4 relevant law enforcement agency shall provide the underlying facts
5 affecting the credibility of the peace officer to the peace officer
6 for purposes of a hearing under subsection E of this section.
7 E. The Office of the Attorney General shall refer the petition
8 to an administrative law judge for an evidentiary hearing. The
9 administrative law judge shall provide findings of fact and
10 conclusions of law as to the validity of the allegations of
11 misconduct by the peace officer that resulted in the peace officer
12 being placed on a "Do Not Call" list of noncredible peace officers.
13 The respondent in the hearing shall be the law enforcement agency
14 that reported or alleged the misconduct by the peace officer.
15 F. 1. If a peace officer has been placed on a "Do Not Call"
16 list of noncredible peace officers due to an allegation of
17 misconduct and the administrative process addressing said allegation
18 is still pending or has been appealed, the administrative law judge
19 shall find in favor of the peace officer.
20 2. If the administrative law judge finds the allegations of
21 misconduct are not supported by a preponderance of the evidence, the
22 law enforcement agency and attorney for the state may not rely on
23 said allegations for any purpose. Any court that considers the
24 credibility of a peace officer who has filed a petition with the
Req. No. 10029 Page 3
1 Office of the Attorney General, as authorized under the provisions
2 of this section, shall be provided a copy of the findings of fact
3 and conclusions of law issued by the administrative law judge.
4 G. Nothing in the provisions of this act shall prevent an
5 attorney representing the state from disclosing credibility issues
6 of a witness to the court.
7 SECTION 2. This act shall become effective November 1, 2025.
8
9 60-1-10029 GRS 01/02/25
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Req. No. 10029 Page 4Every fact on this page links to its source, starting with the official bill record.