Shown verbatim: the complete text as captured from the official source posted by the New York State Senate, fetched 2026-08-11. Nothing is edited or removed. Where this bill amends existing law, language marked for deletion in the official source appears here in brackets. The official bill page.
S T A T E O F N E W Y O R K
________________________________________________________________________
822
2025-2026 Regular Sessions
I N S E N A T E
(PREFILED)
January 8, 2025
___________
Introduced by Sen. GONZALEZ -- read twice and ordered printed, and when
printed to be committed to the Committee on Rules
AN ACT to amend the state technology law and the civil service law, in
relation to the disclosure of automated employment decision-making
tools and maintaining an artificial intelligence inventory; to amend a
chapter of the laws of 2024 amending the state technology law relating
to automated decision-making by state agencies, as proposed in legis-
lative bills numbers S. 7543-B and A. 9430-B, in relation to the
effectiveness thereof; to repeal sections 1 and 3 of a chapter of the
laws of 2024 amending the state technology law relating to automated
decision-making by state agencies, as proposed in legislative bills
numbers S. 7543-B and A. 9430-B, in relation to the short title and
disclosure; to repeal sections 403 and 404 of the state technology law
relating to impact assessments and submission of certain reports; and
providing for the repeal of certain provisions upon expiration thereof
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM-
BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Sections 1 and 3 of a chapter of the laws of 2024 amending
the state technology law relating to automated decision-making by state
agencies, as proposed in legislative bills numbers S. 7543-B and A.
9430-B, are REPEALED.
§ 2. Sections 403 and 404 of the state technology law, as added by a
chapter of the laws of 2024 amending the state technology law relating
to automated decision-making by state agencies, as proposed in legisla-
tive bills numbers S. 7543-B and A. 9430-B, are REPEALED.
§ 3. The article heading of article 4 and sections 401 and 402 of the
state technology law, as added by a chapter of the laws of 2024 amending
the state technology law relating to automated decision-making by state
agencies, as proposed in legislative bills numbers S. 7543-B and A.
9430-B, are amended to read as follows:
EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
[ ] is old law to be omitted.
LBD02895-01-5
S. 822 2
AUTOMATED EMPLOYMENT DECISION-MAKING IN STATE GOVERNMENT
§ 401. Definitions. For the purpose of this article:
1. "Automated EMPLOYMENT decision-making [system] TOOL" shall mean any
software that uses algorithms, computational models, or artificial
intelligence techniques, or a combination thereof, to MATERIALLY auto-
mate[, support,] or replace human decision-making [and shall include,
without limitation, systems that process data, and apply predefined
rules or machine learning algorithms to analyze such data, and generate
conclusions, recommendations, outcomes, assumptions, projections, or
predictions without meaningful human discretion] REGARDING EMPLOYMENT,
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WAGES AND OTHER COMPENSATION, HIRING,
SELECTION FOR RECRUITMENT, DISCIPLINE, PROMOTION, AND TERMINATION.
"Automated EMPLOYMENT decision-making [system] TOOL" shall not include
any software used primarily for basic computerized processes, such as
calculators, spellcheck tools, autocorrect functions, spreadsheets,
electronic communications, or any tool that relates only to internal
management affairs such as ordering office supplies or processing
payments, and that do not materially affect the rights, liberties, bene-
fits, safety or welfare of any individual within the state.
2. ["Meaningful human review" means review, oversight and control of
the automated decision-making process by one or more individuals who
understand the risks, limitations, and functionality of, and are trained
to use, the automated decision-making system and who have the authority
to intervene or alter the decision under review, including but not
limited to the ability to approve, deny, or modify any decision recom-
mended or made by the automated system.
3.] "State agency" shall mean any department, public authority, board,
bureau, commission, division, office, council, committee or officer of
the state. Such terms shall not include the legislature or judiciary.
[4. "Public assistance benefit" shall mean any service or program
within the control of the state, or benefit provided by the state to
individuals or households, including but not limited to public assist-
ance, cash assistance, grants, child care assistance, housing assist-
ance, unemployment benefits, transportation benefits, education assist-
ance, domestic violence services, and any other assistance or benefit
within the authority of the state to grant to individuals within the
state. This shall not include any federal program that is administered
by the federal government or the state.]
§ 402. [Use] DISCLOSURE of automated EMPLOYMENT decision-making
[systems by agencies] TOOLS. [1. No state agency, or any entity acting
on behalf of such agency, which utilizes or applies any automated deci-
sion-making system, directly or indirectly, in performing any function
that: (a) is related to the delivery of any public assistance benefit;
(b) will have a material impact on the rights, civil liberties, safety
or welfare of any individual within the state; or (c) affects any statu-
torily or constitutionally provided right of an individual, shall
utilize such automated decision-making system, unless such automated
decision-making system is subject to continued and operational meaning-
ful human review.
2. No state agency shall authorize any procurement, purchase or acqui-
sition of any service or system utilizing, or relying on, automated
decision-making systems in performing any function that is: (a) related
to the delivery of any public assistance benefit; (b) will have a mate-
rial impact on the rights, civil liberties, safety or welfare of any
individual within the state; or (c) affects any statutorily or constitu-
tionally provided right of an individual unless such automated deci-
S. 822 3
sion-making system is subject to continued and operational meaningful
human review.
3. The use of an automated decision-making system shall not affect (a)
the existing rights of employees pursuant to an existing collective
bargaining agreement, or (b) the existing representational relationships
among employee organizations or the bargaining relationships between the
employer and an employee organization. The use of an automated deci-
sion-making system shall not result in the: (1) discharge, displacement
or loss of position, including partial displacement such as a reduction
in the hours of non-overtime work, wages, or employment benefits, or
result in the impairment of existing collective bargaining agreements;
(2) transfer of existing duties and functions currently performed by
employees of the state or any agency or public authority thereof to an
automated decision-making system; or (3) transfer of future duties and
functions ordinarily performed by employees of the state or any agency
or public authority. The use of an automated decision-making system
shall not alter the rights or benefits, and privileges, including but
not limited to terms and conditions of employment, civil service status,
and collective bargaining unit membership status of all existing employ-
ees of the state or any agency or public authority thereof shall be
preserved and protected] ANY STATE AGENCY THAT UTILIZES AN AUTOMATED
EMPLOYMENT DECISION-MAKING TOOL, AS DEFINED IN SECTION FOUR HUNDRED ONE
OF THIS ARTICLE, SHALL PUBLISH A LIST OF SUCH AUTOMATED EMPLOYMENT DECI-
SION-MAKING TOOLS ON SUCH STATE AGENCY'S WEBSITE NO LATER THAN THE THIR-
TIETH OF DECEMBER NEXT SUCCEEDING THE DATE ON WHICH THE AMENDMENTS MADE
TO THIS SECTION BY A CHAPTER OF THE LAWS OF TWO THOUSAND TWENTY-FOUR
TAKE EFFECT, AND ANNUALLY THEREAFTER. SUCH DISCLOSURE SHALL INCLUDE:
1. A DESCRIPTION OF THE AUTOMATED EMPLOYMENT DECISION-MAKING TOOL
UTILIZED BY SUCH STATE AGENCY;
2. THE DATE THAT THE STATE AGENCY USE OF SUCH AUTOMATED EMPLOYMENT
DECISION-MAKING TOOL BEGAN;
3. A SUMMARY OF THE PURPOSE AND USE OF SUCH AUTOMATED EMPLOYMENT DECI-
SION-MAKING TOOL; AND
4. ANY OTHER INFORMATION DEEMED RELEVANT BY THE AGENCY.
§ 4. The state technology law is amended by adding a new section 103-e
to read as follows:
§ 103-E. ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI) INVENTORY. 1. THE OFFICE SHALL
MAINTAIN AN INVENTORY OF STATE AGENCY ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS.
THE OFFICE SHALL ISSUE GUIDANCE TO STATE AGENCIES IDENTIFYING THE DATA
ELEMENTS TO BE COLLECTED AND SUBMITTED TO THE OFFICE FOR SUCH INVENTORY,
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE PURPOSE AND USES OF THE ARTIFICIAL
INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS. THE INVENTORY SHALL BE POSTED ON THE NEW YORK
STATE OPEN DATA WEBSITE ON THE THIRTIETH OF DECEMBER NEXT SUCCEEDING THE
DATE THIS SECTION TAKES EFFECT, AND ANNUALLY THEREAFTER. STATE AGENCIES
SHALL SUBMIT INFORMATION REQUIRED BY THE OFFICE AT LEAST SIXTY DAYS IN
ADVANCE OF THE ANNUAL PUBLICATION DATE. THE OFFICE MAY WITHHOLD CERTAIN
INFORMATION IF IT DETERMINES DISCLOSURE OF THIS INFORMATION WOULD JEOP-
ARDIZE THE SECURITY OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ASSETS, OR AS PRESCRIBED
BY ARTICLE SIX OF THE PUBLIC OFFICERS LAW.
2. FOR PURPOSES OF THIS SECTION, "ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEM"
SHALL MEAN A MACHINE-BASED SYSTEM THAT CAN, FOR A GIVEN SET OF HUMAN-DE-
FINED OBJECTIVES, MAKE PREDICTIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS, OR DECISIONS INFLU-
ENCING REAL OR VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENTS THAT, WHEN USED, MAY "DIRECTLY
IMPACT THE PUBLIC". ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS USE MACHINE- AND
HUMAN-BASED INPUTS TO PERCEIVE REAL AND VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENTS, ABSTRACT
SUCH PERCEPTIONS INTO MODELS THROUGH ANALYSIS IN AN AUTOMATED MANNER,
S. 822 4
AND USE MODEL INFERENCE TO FORMULATE OPTIONS FOR INFORMATION OR ACTION.
"ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEM" INCLUDES BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO SYSTEMS
THAT USE MACHINE LEARNING, LARGE LANGUAGE MODEL, NATURAL LANGUAGE PROC-
ESSING, AND COMPUTER VISION TECHNOLOGIES, INCLUDING GENERATIVE ARTIFI-
CIAL INTELLIGENCE. "ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEM" SHALL NOT INCLUDE
BASIC CALCULATIONS, BASIC AUTOMATION, OR PRE-RECORDED RULE-BASED CONDI-
TIONAL LOGIC RESPONSE SYSTEMS WITH PREDEFINED TRIGGERS THAT AUTOMAT-
ICALLY INITIATE PREDETERMINED ACTIONS, SUCH AS IF THIS THEN THAT (IFTT)
SYSTEMS.
3. FOR PURPOSES OF THIS SECTION, "DIRECTLY IMPACT THE PUBLIC" SHALL
MEAN WHEN THE USE OF AN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEM WOULD CONTROL,
HAVE A MATERIAL IMPACT ON, OR MEANINGFULLY INFLUENCE THE OUTCOME OF
ACTIVITIES THAT IMPACT THE SAFETY, WELFARE, OR RIGHTS OF THE PUBLIC.
SUCH ACTIVITIES INCLUDE BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO ASSESSMENTS OR DECISIONS
ABOUT INDIVIDUALS INCLUDING IN LAW ENFORCEMENT, HOUSING, HIRING AND
EMPLOYMENT, FINANCIAL, EDUCATIONAL, OR HEALTHCARE CONTEXTS, DECISIONS
REGARDING ACCESS TO OR ELIGIBILITY FOR GOVERNMENT BENEFITS OR ABOUT
CHILD WELFARE, OR THE FUNCTIONING OF EMERGENCY SERVICES OR CRITICAL
INFRASTRUCTURE.
4. THE OFFICE MAY ASK AND SHALL RECEIVE FROM ANY STATE AGENCY ANY
INFORMATION OR ASSISTANCE NECESSARY TO CARRY OUT ITS POWERS AND DUTIES
UNDER THIS SECTION.
5. THE OFFICE SHALL SUBMIT A COPY OF THE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
INVENTORY TO THE GOVERNOR, THE TEMPORARY PRESIDENT OF THE SENATE, AND
THE SPEAKER OF THE ASSEMBLY.
§ 5. Section 80 of the civil service law is amended by adding a new
subdivision 10 to read as follows:
10. (A) THE USE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS AS DEFINED BY
SECTION ONE HUNDRED THREE-E OF THE STATE TECHNOLOGY LAW SHALL NOT AFFECT
(I) THE EXISTING RIGHTS OF EMPLOYEES PURSUANT TO AN EXISTING COLLECTIVE
BARGAINING AGREEMENT, OR (II) THE EXISTING REPRESENTATIONAL RELATION-
SHIPS AMONG EMPLOYEE ORGANIZATIONS OR THE BARGAINING RELATIONSHIPS
BETWEEN THE EMPLOYER AND AN EMPLOYEE ORGANIZATION.
(B) THE USE OF SUCH ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS SHALL NOT RESULT
IN THE: (I) DISCHARGE, DISPLACEMENT OR LOSS OF POSITION, INCLUDING
PARTIAL DISPLACEMENT SUCH AS A REDUCTION IN THE HOURS OF NON-OVERTIME
WORK, WAGES, OR EMPLOYMENT BENEFITS, OR RESULT IN THE IMPAIRMENT OF
EXISTING COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGREEMENTS; OR
(II) TRANSFER OF EXISTING DUTIES AND FUNCTIONS CURRENTLY PERFORMED BY
EMPLOYEES OF THE STATE OR ANY AGENCY OR PUBLIC AUTHORITY THEREOF TO AN
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEM.
(C) THE USE OF AN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE SYSTEM SHALL NOT ALTER THE
RIGHTS OR BENEFITS, AND PRIVILEGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO TERMS
AND CONDITIONS OF EMPLOYMENT, CIVIL SERVICE STATUS, AND COLLECTIVE
BARGAINING UNIT MEMBERSHIP STATUS OF ALL EXISTING EMPLOYEES OF THE STATE
OR ANY AGENCY OR PUBLIC AUTHORITY THEREOF SHALL BE PRESERVED AND
PROTECTED.
§ 6. Section 4 of a chapter of the laws of 2024 amending the state
technology law relating to automated decision-making by state agencies,
as proposed in legislative bills numbers S. 7543-B and A. 9430-B, is
amended to read as follows:
§ 4. This act shall take effect [immediately, provided that section
two of this act shall take effect one year after it shall have become a
law] JULY 1, 2025.
§ 7. This act shall take effect immediately; provided, however, that
sections one, two, three, four and five of this act shall take effect on
S. 822 5
the same date and in the same manner as a chapter of the laws of 2024
amending the state technology law relating to automated decision-making
by state agencies, as proposed in legislative bills numbers S. 7543-B
and A. 9430-B, takes effect; and provided, further, that section five of
this act shall expire and be deemed repealed July 1, 2028.Every fact on this page links to its source, starting with the official bill record.