Relates to the right to counsel in certain family court proceedings
Introduced
Moved
Reached a final decision
Vetoed
Derived from the official record below.
Officially: “Relates to the right to counsel in certain family court proceedings” Read the full text
Senate
What it does
Relates to the right to counsel in certain family court proceedings regarding violations of orders of child support and to establish paternity or parentage in the family court.
Summary from the sponsor's memo in the official legislative record, shown verbatim. Not legal advice.
Where it is
REFERRED TO CHILDREN AND FAMILIES · May 20, 2025
Senate
REPORTED AND COMMITTED TO FINANCE · May 29, 2025
Senate
COMMITTEE DISCHARGED AND COMMITTED TO RULES · Jun 9, 2025
Senate
ORDERED TO THIRD READING CAL.1655 · Jun 9, 2025
Senate
PASSED SENATE · Jun 11, 2025
Senate
DELIVERED TO ASSEMBLY · Jun 11, 2025
Senate
REFERRED TO WAYS AND MEANS · Jun 11, 2025
Assembly
SUBSTITUTED FOR A8271 · Jun 13, 2025
Assembly
ORDERED TO THIRD READING RULES CAL.748 · Jun 13, 2025
Assembly
PASSED ASSEMBLY · Jun 17, 2025
Assembly
RETURNED TO SENATE · Jun 17, 2025
Assembly
DELIVERED TO GOVERNOR · Dec 1, 2025
Senate
VETOED MEMO.98 · Dec 5, 2025
Senate
Why the Governor vetoed it
VETO MESSAGE - No. 98 TO THE SENATE: I am returning herewith, without my approval, the following bill: Senate Bill Number 8197, entitled: "AN ACT to amend the family court act, in relation to the right to counsel in proceedings regarding violations of orders of child support and to establish paternity or parentage in the family court" NOT APPROVED This bill would expand the right to assigned counsel in Family Court proceedings regarding paternity, parentage, and child support. I support the sponsors' goal of expanding access to counsel for litigants assert- ing and defending their fundamental interests and rights, and I recog- nize that having all parties represented by counsel can promote the efficient and effective resolution of these cases. This bill does not provide state funding to help counties meet the requirements of the law, however. Due to the significant investment of resource...
Veto message no. 98, quoted verbatim from the official record, signed KATHY HOCHUL. The full message is on the official bill page.
The numbers
1
sponsor on the bill
Sponsors
Jabari Brisport
Recorded votes
Recorded voteSenate · 2025-06-11 · EXC 4, NAY 5, AYE 54
Recorded voteSenate · 2025-06-09 · AYEWR 4, NAY 1, AYE 16
Recorded voteSenate · 2025-05-29 · EXC 1, AYE 6
Roll-call results shown verbatim from the New York legislature’s records. A result reflects that roll call’s own motion, not the bill’s overall outcome.
Who is lobbying on this
Association of Counties and Its Affiliated Organizations (NYS)via Association of Counties and Its Affiliated Organizations (NYS)
2 filingsRobert Horwitzvia SPENCER STRATEGIC SOLUTIONS, LLC
1 filingFrom 3 filings in New York State lobbying disclosures (COELIG), via data.ny.gov, naming this bill (2025). Filings are self-reported by lobbying firms and show who is paid to influence this bill. They do not say which side, or whether it worked.
Nothing on this page shows why any vote was cast. Recorded votes and lobbying filings are separate official records, self-reported by different parties, and neither explains the other.
Every fact on this page links to its source, starting with the official bill record. Last action: Vetoed (Dec 5, 2025).