govt.fyi
Back to S6953-2025
NY State Legislature· S6953-2025Signed by Governor

Relates to the training and use of artificial intelligence frontier models, the official text

Shown verbatim: the complete text as captured from the official source posted by the New York State Senate, fetched 2026-08-11. Nothing is edited or removed. Where this bill amends existing law, language marked for deletion in the official source appears here in brackets. The official bill page.
S T A T E   O F   N E W   Y O R K
 ________________________________________________________________________
 
                                  6953--B
 
                        2025-2026 Regular Sessions
 
                             I N  S E N A T E
 
                              March 27, 2025
                                ___________
 
 Introduced  by Sens. GOUNARDES, BAILEY, BORRELLO, BRISPORT, FAHY, HARCK-
   HAM, HOYLMAN-SIGAL, JACKSON, KRUEGER, LIU, MAYER, PALUMBO, SALAZAR  --
   read  twice  and  ordered printed, and when printed to be committed to
   the Committee on Internet and Technology -- committee discharged, bill
   amended, ordered reprinted as amended and recommitted to said  commit-
   tee  --  committee  discharged,  bill  amended,  ordered  reprinted as
   amended and recommitted to said committee
 
 AN ACT to amend the general business law, in relation  to  the  training
   and use of artificial intelligence frontier models
 
   THE  PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, REPRESENTED IN SENATE AND ASSEM-
 BLY, DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
 
   Section 1. Short title. This act shall be known and may  be  cited  as
 the "Responsible AI safety and education act" or "RAISE act".
   §  2. The general business law is amended by adding a new article 44-B
 to read as follows:
                                ARTICLE 44-B
              RESPONSIBLE AI SAFETY AND EDUCATION (RAISE) ACT
 SECTION 1420. DEFINITIONS.
         1421. TRANSPARENCY REQUIREMENTS REGARDING FRONTIER MODEL  TRAIN-
                 ING AND USE.
         1422. VIOLATIONS.
         1423. DUTIES AND OBLIGATIONS.
         1424. SCOPE.
         1425. SEVERABILITY.
   §  1420.  DEFINITIONS.  AS  USED  IN THIS ARTICLE, THE FOLLOWING TERMS
 SHALL HAVE THE FOLLOWING MEANINGS:
   1. "APPROPRIATE REDACTIONS" MEANS REDACTIONS TO A SAFETY AND  SECURITY
 PROTOCOL THAT A DEVELOPER MAY MAKE WHEN NECESSARY TO:
   (A)  PROTECT  PUBLIC SAFETY TO THE EXTENT THE DEVELOPER CAN REASONABLY
 PREDICT SUCH RISKS;
   (B) PROTECT TRADE SECRETS;
 
  EXPLANATION--Matter in ITALICS (underscored) is new; matter in brackets
                       [ ] is old law to be omitted.
                                                            LBD00047-15-5
 S. 6953--B                          2
 
   (C) PREVENT THE RELEASE OF CONFIDENTIAL  INFORMATION  AS  REQUIRED  BY
 STATE OR FEDERAL LAW;
   (D) PROTECT EMPLOYEE OR CUSTOMER PRIVACY; OR
   (E)  PREVENT  THE RELEASE OF INFORMATION OTHERWISE CONTROLLED BY STATE
 OR FEDERAL LAW.
   2. "ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE" MEANS A MACHINE-BASED  SYSTEM  THAT  CAN,
 FOR A GIVEN SET OF HUMAN-DEFINED OBJECTIVES, MAKE PREDICTIONS, RECOMMEN-
 DATIONS, OR DECISIONS INFLUENCING REAL OR VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENTS, AND THAT
 USES  MACHINE- AND HUMAN-BASED INPUTS TO PERCEIVE REAL AND VIRTUAL ENVI-
 RONMENTS, ABSTRACT SUCH PERCEPTIONS INTO MODELS THROUGH ANALYSIS  IN  AN
 AUTOMATED  MANNER,  AND  USE  MODEL  INFERENCE  TO FORMULATE OPTIONS FOR
 INFORMATION OR ACTION.
   3. "ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE MODEL"  MEANS  AN  INFORMATION  SYSTEM  OR
 COMPONENT  OF  AN INFORMATION SYSTEM THAT IMPLEMENTS ARTIFICIAL INTELLI-
 GENCE TECHNOLOGY AND USES COMPUTATIONAL, STATISTICAL, OR  MACHINE-LEARN-
 ING TECHNIQUES TO PRODUCE OUTPUTS FROM A GIVEN SET OF INPUTS.
   4.  "COMPUTE  COST" MEANS THE COST INCURRED TO PAY FOR COMPUTE USED IN
 THE FINAL TRAINING RUN OF A MODEL  WHEN  CALCULATED  USING  THE  AVERAGE
 PUBLISHED  MARKET  PRICES  OF  CLOUD COMPUTE IN THE UNITED STATES AT THE
 START OF TRAINING SUCH MODEL AS REASONABLY ASSESSED BY THE PERSON  DOING
 THE TRAINING.
   5.  "DEPLOY" MEANS TO USE A FRONTIER MODEL OR TO MAKE A FRONTIER MODEL
 FORESEEABLY AVAILABLE TO ONE OR MORE THIRD PARTIES  FOR  USE,  MODIFICA-
 TION,  COPYING, OR A COMBINATION THEREOF WITH OTHER SOFTWARE, EXCEPT FOR
 TRAINING OR DEVELOPING THE FRONTIER MODEL, EVALUATING THE FRONTIER MODEL
 OR OTHER FRONTIER MODELS, OR COMPLYING WITH FEDERAL OR STATE LAWS.
   6. "FRONTIER MODEL" MEANS EITHER OF THE FOLLOWING:
   (A) AN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE MODEL TRAINED USING GREATER THAN  10º26
 COMPUTATIONAL  OPERATIONS  (E.G., INTEGER OR FLOATING-POINT OPERATIONS),
 THE COMPUTE COST OF WHICH EXCEEDS ONE HUNDRED MILLION DOLLARS; OR
   (B) AN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE MODEL PRODUCED  BY  APPLYING  KNOWLEDGE
 DISTILLATION  TO  A  FRONTIER  MODEL AS DEFINED IN PARAGRAPH (A) OF THIS
 SUBDIVISION, PROVIDED THAT THE COMPUTE COST FOR SUCH MODEL  PRODUCED  BY
 APPLYING KNOWLEDGE DISTILLATION EXCEEDS FIVE MILLION DOLLARS.
   7. "CRITICAL HARM" MEANS THE DEATH OR SERIOUS INJURY OF ONE HUNDRED OR
 MORE  PEOPLE  OR  AT  LEAST  ONE BILLION DOLLARS OF DAMAGES TO RIGHTS IN
 MONEY OR PROPERTY CAUSED OR MATERIALLY ENABLED BY  A  LARGE  DEVELOPER'S
 USE,  STORAGE,  OR  RELEASE  OF  A FRONTIER MODEL, THROUGH EITHER OF THE
 FOLLOWING:
   (A) THE CREATION OR USE OF A CHEMICAL,  BIOLOGICAL,  RADIOLOGICAL,  OR
 NUCLEAR WEAPON; OR
   (B)  AN  ARTIFICIAL  INTELLIGENCE  MODEL ENGAGING IN CONDUCT THAT DOES
 BOTH OF THE FOLLOWING:
   (I) ACTS WITH NO MEANINGFUL HUMAN INTERVENTION; AND
   (II) WOULD, IF COMMITTED BY A HUMAN, CONSTITUTE A CRIME  SPECIFIED  IN
 THE  PENAL  LAW THAT REQUIRES INTENT, RECKLESSNESS, OR GROSS NEGLIGENCE,
 OR THE SOLICITATION OR AIDING AND ABETTING OF SUCH A CRIME.
   A HARM INFLICTED BY AN INTERVENING HUMAN ACTOR SHALL NOT BE DEEMED  TO
 RESULT  FROM  A  DEVELOPER'S  ACTIVITIES  UNLESS  SUCH ACTIVITIES WERE A
 SUBSTANTIAL FACTOR IN BRINGING ABOUT THE  HARM,  THE  INTERVENING  HUMAN
 ACTOR'S  CONDUCT WAS REASONABLY FORESEEABLE AS A PROBABLE CONSEQUENCE OF
 THE DEVELOPER'S ACTIVITIES, AND COULD HAVE BEEN REASONABLY PREVENTED  OR
 MITIGATED  THROUGH  ALTERNATIVE  DESIGN, OR SECURITY MEASURES, OR SAFETY
 PROTOCOLS.
   8. "KNOWLEDGE DISTILLATION" MEANS ANY  SUPERVISED  LEARNING  TECHNIQUE
 THAT  USES  A  LARGER  ARTIFICIAL  INTELLIGENCE MODEL OR THE OUTPUT OF A
 S. 6953--B                          3
 
 LARGER ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE  MODEL  TO  TRAIN  A  SMALLER  ARTIFICIAL
 INTELLIGENCE MODEL WITH SIMILAR OR EQUIVALENT CAPABILITIES AS THE LARGER
 ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE MODEL.
   9.  "LARGE  DEVELOPER"  MEANS  A  PERSON THAT HAS TRAINED AT LEAST ONE
 FRONTIER MODEL AND HAS SPENT OVER ONE HUNDRED MILLION DOLLARS IN COMPUTE
 COSTS IN AGGREGATE IN TRAINING FRONTIER MODELS.  ACCREDITED COLLEGES AND
 UNIVERSITIES SHALL NOT BE CONSIDERED LARGE DEVELOPERS UNDER THIS ARTICLE
 TO THE EXTENT THAT  SUCH  COLLEGES  AND  UNIVERSITIES  ARE  ENGAGING  IN
 ACADEMIC RESEARCH.  IF A PERSON SUBSEQUENTLY TRANSFERS FULL INTELLECTUAL
 PROPERTY  RIGHTS  OF THE FRONTIER MODEL TO ANOTHER PERSON (INCLUDING THE
 RIGHT TO RESELL THE MODEL) AND RETAINS NONE OF THOSE  RIGHTS  FOR  THEM-
 SELF,  THEN THE RECEIVING PERSON SHALL BE CONSIDERED THE LARGE DEVELOPER
 AND SHALL BE SUBJECT TO THE RESPONSIBILITIES AND  REQUIREMENTS  OF  THIS
 ARTICLE AFTER SUCH TRANSFER.
   10. "MODEL WEIGHT" MEANS A NUMERICAL PARAMETER IN AN ARTIFICIAL INTEL-
 LIGENCE MODEL THAT IS ADJUSTED THROUGH TRAINING AND THAT HELPS DETERMINE
 HOW INPUTS ARE TRANSFORMED INTO OUTPUTS.
   11.  "PERSON"  MEANS AN INDIVIDUAL, PROPRIETORSHIP, FIRM, PARTNERSHIP,
 JOINT VENTURE, SYNDICATE, BUSINESS TRUST, COMPANY, CORPORATION,  LIMITED
 LIABILITY  COMPANY, ASSOCIATION, COMMITTEE, OR ANY OTHER NONGOVERNMENTAL
 ORGANIZATION OR GROUP OF PERSONS ACTING IN CONCERT.
   12. "SAFETY AND SECURITY  PROTOCOL"  MEANS  DOCUMENTED  TECHNICAL  AND
 ORGANIZATIONAL PROTOCOLS THAT:
   (A)  DESCRIBE  REASONABLE PROTECTIONS AND PROCEDURES THAT, IF SUCCESS-
 FULLY IMPLEMENTED WOULD APPROPRIATELY REDUCE THE RISK OF CRITICAL HARM;
   (B)  DESCRIBE  REASONABLE  ADMINISTRATIVE,  TECHNICAL,  AND   PHYSICAL
 CYBERSECURITY  PROTECTIONS FOR FRONTIER MODELS WITHIN THE LARGE DEVELOP-
 ER'S CONTROL THAT, IF SUCCESSFULLY IMPLEMENTED, APPROPRIATELY REDUCE THE
 RISK OF UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO, OR MISUSE OF, THE FRONTIER MODELS  LEAD-
 ING TO CRITICAL HARM, INCLUDING BY SOPHISTICATED ACTORS;
   (C)  DESCRIBE IN DETAIL THE TESTING PROCEDURE TO EVALUATE IF THE FRON-
 TIER MODEL POSES AN UNREASONABLE RISK OF CRITICAL HARM AND  WHETHER  THE
 FRONTIER MODEL COULD BE MISUSED, BE MODIFIED, BE EXECUTED WITH INCREASED
 COMPUTATIONAL  RESOURCES,  EVADE  THE  CONTROL OF ITS LARGE DEVELOPER OR
 USER, BE COMBINED WITH OTHER SOFTWARE OR BE USED TO CREATE ANOTHER FRON-
 TIER MODEL IN A MANNER THAT WOULD INCREASE THE RISK OF CRITICAL HARM;
   (D) ENABLE THE LARGE DEVELOPER OR  THIRD  PARTY  TO  COMPLY  WITH  THE
 REQUIREMENTS OF THIS ARTICLE; AND
   (E)  DESIGNATE SENIOR PERSONNEL TO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ENSURING COMPLI-
 ANCE.
   13. "SAFETY INCIDENT" MEANS A KNOWN INCIDENCE OF CRITICAL HARM  OR  AN
 INCIDENT  OF  THE  FOLLOWING  KINDS  THAT  OCCURS  IN SUCH A WAY THAT IT
 PROVIDES DEMONSTRABLE EVIDENCE OF AN INCREASED RISK OF CRITICAL HARM:
   (A) A FRONTIER MODEL AUTONOMOUSLY ENGAGING IN BEHAVIOR OTHER  THAN  AT
 THE REQUEST OF A USER;
   (B) THEFT, MISAPPROPRIATION, MALICIOUS USE, INADVERTENT RELEASE, UNAU-
 THORIZED ACCESS, OR ESCAPE OF THE MODEL WEIGHTS OF A FRONTIER MODEL;
   (C)  THE CRITICAL FAILURE OF ANY TECHNICAL OR ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS,
 INCLUDING CONTROLS LIMITING THE ABILITY TO MODIFY A FRONTIER MODEL; OR
   (D) UNAUTHORIZED USE OF A FRONTIER MODEL.
   14. "TRADE SECRET" MEANS ANY FORM AND  TYPE  OF  FINANCIAL,  BUSINESS,
 SCIENTIFIC, TECHNICAL, ECONOMIC, OR ENGINEERING INFORMATION, INCLUDING A
 PATTERN,  PLAN, COMPILATION, PROGRAM DEVICE, FORMULA, DESIGN, PROTOTYPE,
 METHOD, TECHNIQUE, PROCESS, PROCEDURE, PROGRAM, OR CODE, WHETHER  TANGI-
 BLE  OR INTANGIBLE, AND WHETHER OR HOW STORED, COMPILED, OR MEMORIALIZED
 S. 6953--B                          4
 
 PHYSICALLY, ELECTRONICALLY, GRAPHICALLY, PHOTOGRAPHICALLY OR IN WRITING,
 THAT:
   (A)  DERIVES INDEPENDENT ECONOMIC VALUE, ACTUAL OR POTENTIAL, FROM NOT
 BEING GENERALLY KNOWN TO, AND NOT BEING READILY ASCERTAINABLE BY  PROPER
 MEANS  BY,  OTHER PERSONS WHO CAN OBTAIN ECONOMIC VALUE FROM ITS DISCLO-
 SURE OR USE; AND
   (B) IS THE SUBJECT OF EFFORTS THAT ARE REASONABLE  UNDER  THE  CIRCUM-
 STANCES TO MAINTAIN ITS SECRECY.
   §  1421.  TRANSPARENCY  REQUIREMENTS REGARDING FRONTIER MODEL TRAINING
 AND USE. 1. BEFORE DEPLOYING A FRONTIER MODEL, THE  LARGE  DEVELOPER  OF
 SUCH FRONTIER MODEL SHALL DO ALL OF THE FOLLOWING:
   (A) IMPLEMENT A WRITTEN SAFETY AND SECURITY PROTOCOL;
   (B)  RETAIN  AN  UNREDACTED  COPY OF THE SAFETY AND SECURITY PROTOCOL,
 INCLUDING RECORDS AND DATES OF ANY UPDATES OR REVISIONS. SUCH UNREDACTED
 COPY OF THE SAFETY AND SECURITY PROTOCOL, INCLUDING RECORDS AND DATES OF
 ANY UPDATES OR REVISIONS, SHALL BE RETAINED FOR AS LONG  AS  A  FRONTIER
 MODEL IS DEPLOYED PLUS FIVE YEARS;
   (C) (I) CONSPICUOUSLY PUBLISH A COPY OF THE SAFETY AND SECURITY PROTO-
 COL  WITH  APPROPRIATE  REDACTIONS  AND TRANSMIT A COPY OF SUCH REDACTED
 SAFETY AND SECURITY PROTOCOL TO THE ATTORNEY  GENERAL  AND  DIVISION  OF
 HOMELAND SECURITY AND EMERGENCY SERVICES;
   (II)  GRANT THE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND DIVISION OF HOMELAND SECURITY AND
 EMERGENCY SERVICES OR THE ATTORNEY GENERAL  ACCESS  TO  THE  SAFETY  AND
 SECURITY PROTOCOL, WITH REDACTIONS ONLY TO THE EXTENT REQUIRED BY FEDER-
 AL LAW, UPON REQUEST;
   (D) RECORD, AS AND WHEN REASONABLY POSSIBLE, AND RETAIN FOR AS LONG AS
 THE  FRONTIER  MODEL  IS  DEPLOYED  PLUS  FIVE  YEARS INFORMATION ON THE
 SPECIFIC TESTS AND TEST RESULTS USED IN ANY ASSESSMENT OF  THE  FRONTIER
 MODEL  REQUIRED  BY  THIS SECTION OR THE DEVELOPER'S SAFETY AND SECURITY
 PROTOCOL THAT PROVIDES SUFFICIENT DETAIL FOR THIRD PARTIES TO  REPLICATE
 THE TESTING PROCEDURE; AND
   (E)  IMPLEMENT  APPROPRIATE SAFEGUARDS TO PREVENT UNREASONABLE RISK OF
 CRITICAL HARM.
   2. A LARGE DEVELOPER SHALL NOT DEPLOY A FRONTIER  MODEL  IF  DOING  SO
 WOULD CREATE AN UNREASONABLE RISK OF CRITICAL HARM.
   3.  A LARGE DEVELOPER SHALL CONDUCT AN ANNUAL REVIEW OF ANY SAFETY AND
 SECURITY  PROTOCOL REQUIRED BY THIS SECTION TO ACCOUNT FOR  ANY  CHANGES
 TO THE CAPABILITIES OF THEIR FRONTIER MODELS AND INDUSTRY BEST PRACTICES
 AND, IF NECESSARY, MAKE MODIFICATIONS TO SUCH SAFETY AND SECURITY PROTO-
 COL.   IF ANY MATERIAL MODIFICATIONS ARE MADE, THE LARGE DEVELOPER SHALL
 PUBLISH THE SAFETY AND SECURITY PROTOCOL IN THE SAME MANNER AS  REQUIRED
 PURSUANT TO PARAGRAPH (C) OF SUBDIVISION ONE OF THIS SECTION.
   4. A LARGE DEVELOPER SHALL DISCLOSE EACH SAFETY INCIDENT AFFECTING THE
 FRONTIER MODEL TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL AND DIVISION OF HOMELAND SECURITY
 AND  EMERGENCY  SERVICES WITHIN SEVENTY-TWO HOURS OF THE LARGE DEVELOPER
 LEARNING OF THE SAFETY INCIDENT OR WITHIN SEVENTY-TWO HOURS OF THE LARGE
 DEVELOPER LEARNING FACTS SUFFICIENT TO  ESTABLISH  A  REASONABLE  BELIEF
 THAT A SAFETY INCIDENT HAS OCCURRED.  SUCH DISCLOSURE SHALL INCLUDE: (A)
 THE  DATE OF THE SAFETY INCIDENT; (B) THE REASONS THE INCIDENT QUALIFIES
 AS A SAFETY INCIDENT AS DEFINED IN SUBDIVISION THIRTEEN OF SECTION FOUR-
 TEEN HUNDRED TWENTY OF THIS ARTICLE; AND (C) A SHORT AND PLAIN STATEMENT
 DESCRIBING THE SAFETY INCIDENT.
   5. A LARGE DEVELOPER SHALL NOT  KNOWINGLY  MAKE  FALSE  OR  MATERIALLY
 MISLEADING  STATEMENTS  OR  OMISSIONS IN OR REGARDING DOCUMENTS PRODUCED
 PURSUANT TO THIS SECTION.
 S. 6953--B                          5
 
   § 1422. VIOLATIONS. 1. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL MAY BRING A  CIVIL  ACTION
 FOR  A  VIOLATION  OF  THIS ARTICLE AND TO RECOVER ALL OF THE FOLLOWING,
 DETERMINED BASED ON SEVERITY OF THE VIOLATION:
   (A)  FOR  A VIOLATION   OF SECTION FOURTEEN HUNDRED TWENTY-ONE OF THIS
 ARTICLE, A CIVIL PENALTY IN AN AMOUNT NOT EXCEEDING TEN MILLION  DOLLARS
 FOR  A  FIRST  VIOLATION  AND  IN AN AMOUNT NOT EXCEEDING THIRTY MILLION
 DOLLARS FOR ANY SUBSEQUENT VIOLATION.
   (B) FOR A VIOLATION OF SECTION FOURTEEN  HUNDRED  TWENTY-ONE  OF  THIS
 ARTICLE, INJUNCTIVE OR DECLARATORY RELIEF.
   2.  NOTHING  IN THIS ARTICLE SHALL BE CONSTRUED TO ESTABLISH A PRIVATE
 RIGHT OF ACTION ASSOCIATED WITH VIOLATIONS OF THIS ARTICLE.
   3. NOTHING IN THIS SUBDIVISION SHALL BE CONSTRUED TO PREVENT  A  LARGE
 DEVELOPER  FROM  ASSERTING THAT ANOTHER PERSON, ENTITY, OR FACTOR MAY BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY ALLEGED HARM, INJURY, OR  DAMAGE  RESULTING  FROM  A
 CRITICAL HARM OR A VIOLATION OF THIS ARTICLE.
   4. THIS SECTION DOES NOT LIMIT THE APPLICATION OF OTHER LAWS.
   §  1423. DUTIES AND OBLIGATIONS. THE DUTIES AND OBLIGATIONS IMPOSED BY
 THIS ARTICLE ARE CUMULATIVE WITH ANY OTHER DUTIES OR OBLIGATIONS IMPOSED
 UNDER OTHER LAW AND SHALL NOT BE CONSTRUED TO RELIEVE ANY PARTY FROM ANY
 DUTIES OR OBLIGATIONS IMPOSED UNDER OTHER  LAW  AND  DO  NOT  LIMIT  ANY
 RIGHTS OR REMEDIES UNDER EXISTING LAW.
   §  1424.  SCOPE. THIS ARTICLE SHALL ONLY APPLY TO FRONTIER MODELS THAT
 ARE DEVELOPED, DEPLOYED, OR OPERATING IN WHOLE OR IN PART  IN  NEW  YORK
 STATE.
   § 1425. SEVERABILITY. IF ANY CLAUSE, SENTENCE, PARAGRAPH, SUBDIVISION,
 SECTION OR PART OF THIS ARTICLE SHALL BE ADJUDGED BY ANY COURT OF COMPE-
 TENT JURISDICTION TO BE INVALID, SUCH JUDGMENT SHALL NOT AFFECT, IMPAIR,
 OR INVALIDATE THE REMAINDER THEREOF, BUT SHALL BE CONFINED IN ITS OPERA-
 TION  TO  THE CLAUSE, SENTENCE, PARAGRAPH, SUBDIVISION, SECTION, OR PART
 THEREOF DIRECTLY INVOLVED IN THE  CONTROVERSY  IN  WHICH  SUCH  JUDGMENT
 SHALL HAVE BEEN MADE.
   §  3.  This  act shall take effect on the ninetieth day after it shall
 have become a law.
Every fact on this page links to its source, starting with the official bill record.