govt.fyi
NY State Legislature · A6613-2025 · Vetoed

Permits records required to be disclosed under the freedom of information law to have exempt parts of such documents be redacted before disclosure

Introduced
Moved
Reached a final decision
Vetoed
Derived from the official record below.

Officially: “Permits records required to be disclosed under the freedom of information law to have exempt parts of such documents be redacted before disclosure Read the full text

Assembly

What it does

Permits records required to be disclosed under the freedom of information law to have exempt parts of such documents be redacted before disclosure.
Summary from the sponsor's memo in the official legislative record, shown verbatim. Not legal advice.

Where it is

REFERRED TO GOVERNMENTAL OPERATIONS · Mar 6, 2025

Assembly

REPORTED REFERRED TO RULES · Jun 5, 2025

Assembly

REPORTED · Jun 9, 2025

Assembly

RULES REPORT CAL.510 · Jun 9, 2025

Assembly

ORDERED TO THIRD READING RULES CAL.510 · Jun 9, 2025

Assembly

PASSED ASSEMBLY · Jun 9, 2025

Assembly

DELIVERED TO SENATE · Jun 9, 2025

Assembly

REFERRED TO RULES · Jun 9, 2025

Senate

SUBSTITUTED FOR S67 · Jun 11, 2025

Senate

3RD READING CAL.1431 · Jun 11, 2025

Senate

PASSED SENATE · Jun 11, 2025

Senate

RETURNED TO ASSEMBLY · Jun 11, 2025

Senate

DELIVERED TO GOVERNOR · Dec 1, 2025

Assembly

VETOED MEMO.69 · Dec 5, 2025

Assembly

TABLED · Dec 5, 2025

Assembly

Why the Governor vetoed it

VETO MESSAGE - No. 69 TO THE ASSEMBLY: I am returning herewith, without my approval, the following bill: Assembly Bill Number 6613, entitled: "AN ACT to amend the public officers law, in relation to permitting records required to be disclosed under the freedom of information law to have exempt parts of such documents be redacted before disclosure" NOT APPROVED This bill would require agencies to disclose records that are disclos- able under the Freedom of Information Law while redacting or withholding any portions of such records that are subject to an exception from disclosure. This bill is unnecessary and duplicative of current law, which already permits agencies to withhold records or portions of records that are otherwise exempt from disclosure under FOIL. I am therefore constrained to veto this bill. The bill is disapproved. (signed) KATHY HOCHUL __________...
Veto message no. 69, quoted verbatim from the official record, signed KATHY HOCHUL. The full message is on the official bill page.

The numbers

2
sponsors on the bill

Sponsors

John T. McDonald IIIJudy Griffin

Recorded votes

Recorded voteSenate · 2025-06-11 · EXC 4, NAY 2, AYE 57
Roll-call results shown verbatim from the New York legislature’s records. A result reflects that roll call’s own motion, not the bill’s overall outcome.

Who is lobbying on this

NEW YORK CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION, INC.via NEW YORK CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION, INC.
2 filings
From 2 filings in New York State lobbying disclosures (COELIG), via data.ny.gov, naming this bill (2025). Filings are self-reported by lobbying firms and show who is paid to influence this bill. They do not say which side, or whether it worked.
Nothing on this page shows why any vote was cast. Recorded votes and lobbying filings are separate official records, self-reported by different parties, and neither explains the other.
Every fact on this page links to its source, starting with the official bill record. Last action: Vetoed (Dec 5, 2025).