Shown verbatim: the complete text as captured from the official page posted by the Hawaii State Legislature, fetched 2026-08-29. Where this bill amends existing law, language marked for deletion in the official page appears here in brackets. This is the first conference draft. The official bill page.
THE SENATE S.B. NO. 2567 THIRTY-THIRD LEGISLATURE, 2026 S.D. 2 STATE OF HAWAII H.D. 2 C.D. 1 A BILL FOR AN ACT RELATING TO PETITIONS TO TEMPORARILY RESTRAIN AND ENJOIN HARASSMENT OF AN EMPLOYEE. BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF HAWAII: SECTION 1. The legislature finds that state law currently allows a person to obtain a temporary restraining order and an injunction against harassment. The legislature further finds that there is a need to extend these protections to allow employers to protect employees against employment‑related harassment. In recent times, employees in the public and private sectors across the country have experienced an alarming increase in harassment, acts of violence, or threats to engage in acts of violence in the course and scope of their work. The legislature also finds that numerous studies and reports confirm this trend in the public sector. For example, a 2021 study titled "On the Frontlines of Today's Cities: Trauma, Challenges and Solutions" by the National League of Cities found that eighty-one per cent of local public officials surveyed said they had experienced harassment, threats, or violence in recent years. In addition to having their safety and well‑being threatened, the report found that harassment and violent behavior interrupted local officials' ability to do their jobs and led to the loss of institutional knowledge due to resignations. The legislature additionally finds that in 2024, the National League of Cities conducted a survey as an update to the earlier 2021 report, polling mayors, city council members, and city managers about their personal experiences of harassment as part of their work. Seventy-three per cent of surveyed mayors, city council members, and city managers reported personally experiencing harassment as part of their work. Of those who experienced harassment, eighty-nine per cent experienced harassment on social media and eighty-four per cent experienced harassment during public city meetings. Twenty-three per cent of respondents reported harassment of their family or loved ones. The legislature further finds that other public servants, including state legislators and judges, have experienced increasing threats or attacks. In a series of national surveys completed in October 2023, the Brennan Center for Justice, based on data sets representing more than one thousand seven hundred officials from all fifty states, found that more than forty per cent of state legislators experienced threats or attacks within the past three years and eighty-nine per cent of state legislators experienced insults or harassment, including stalking. The legislature further finds that data gathered by the federal and state courts illustrates that the trend of threats and inappropriate communications against public officials is increasing. United States Marshals Service data from 2025 shows one hundred sixty-two federal judges were threatened in March and early April 2025. At the state level, the number of threats and other inappropriate communications received by the State's judges has increased twentyfold since 2012. The legislature notes that allowing an employer to seek an order of protection in favor of employees to enjoin employment‑related harassment has been a feature of California law for some time. In the 1990s, California enacted a law to allow an employer to obtain a protective order on behalf of an employee. The law is presently codified in section 527.8 of the California Code of Civil Procedure. In the decades since this law was enacted, employers in California, including government entities, have obtained restraining orders to prohibit a person from harassing their employees. Under existing state law, there is no mechanism for state entities to secure a temporary restraining order and permanent injunction on behalf of a harassed public employee. The legislature finds that a system for retaining private attorneys on behalf of the harassed public employee is the only proper mechanism for providing legal representation with respect to state employers. The attorney general is the chief legal officer for the State and by representing clients in a personal capacity as plaintiffs in civil suits, irrespective of the merits of those suits, the attorney general could create potential conflicts of interest and unforeseen consequences. Accordingly, the purpose of this Act is to establish a two‑year pilot project to expand protections against employment‑related harassment by allowing public employers to secure a temporary restraining order and an injunction on behalf of a harassed employee under specified circumstances. SECTION 2. Section 604-10.5, Hawaii Revised Statutes, is amended to read as follows: "§604-10.5 Power to enjoin and temporarily restrain harassment. (a) For the purposes of this section: "Course of conduct" means a pattern of conduct composed of a series of acts over any period of time evidencing a continuity of purpose. "Harassment" means: (1) Physical harm, bodily injury, assault, or the threat of imminent physical harm, bodily injury, or assault; or (2) An intentional or knowing course of conduct directed at an individual that seriously alarms or disturbs consistently or continually bothers the individual and serves no legitimate purpose; provided that [such] the course of conduct would cause a reasonable person to suffer emotional distress. "Public employer" means: (1) The State or any of its political subdivisions; (2) A federal agency; (3) The United States courts; or (4) A public or quasi-public corporation, or any public agency thereof or therein, and any agent thereof. "Public servant" means: (1) Any officer or employee of the executive branch, including the governor, the lieutenant governor, the administrative director appointed pursuant to section 26-3, and any volunteer of the office of elections; (2) Any member of the legislature and any officer or employee of the legislative branch; (3) Any official or employee of the judicial branch, including the administrative director of the courts, the deputy administrative director of the courts, and any active, formerly active, or retired: (A) Justice of the Hawaii supreme court; (B) Judge of the Hawaii intermediate appellate court; (C) Judge of a Hawaii circuit court or circuit family court; (D) Judge of a Hawaii district court or district family court; or (E) Per diem judge of a Hawaii district court or district family court; (4) Any officer or employee of any political subdivision of the State; or (5) Any active, formerly active, or retired: (A) Justice of the United States Supreme Court; (B) Judge of the United States Court of Appeals; (C) Judge or magistrate judge of the United States District Court; or (D) Judge of the United States Bankruptcy Court, who resides in the State, formerly resided in the State while serving as a federal judge, or owns real property in the State. "Public servant of the State" means a public servant as defined in paragraphs (1), (2), and (3) of the definition of "public servant". "Public servant of the State" does not include other individuals not expressly provided for in this definition. (b) The district courts shall have the power to enjoin, prohibit, or temporarily restrain harassment. (c) Any person who has been subjected to harassment, or the public employer of a public servant who has been subjected to harassment related to their employment as a public servant, may petition the district court for a temporary restraining order and an injunction from further harassment in the district in which: (1) The petitioner resides or is temporarily located; (2) The respondent resides; or (3) The harassment occurred. (d) A petition for relief from harassment shall [be]: (1) Be in writing [and shall allege]; (2) Allege that a past act or acts of harassment may have occurred or that threats of harassment make it probable that acts of harassment may be imminent; and [shall be] (3) Be accompanied by an affidavit made under oath or a statement made under penalty of perjury stating the specific facts and circumstances for which relief is sought. (e) Upon petition to a district court under this section, the court may allow a petition, complaint, motion, or other document to be filed identifying the petitioner as "jane doe" or "john doe"; provided that the court finds that the "jane doe" or "john doe" filing is reasonably necessary to protect the privacy of the petitioner and will not unduly prejudice the prosecution or the defense of the action. In considering a petition requesting a "jane doe" or "john doe" filing, the court shall weigh the petitioner's interest in privacy against the public interest in disclosure. The court, only after finding clear and convincing evidence that would make public inspection inconsistent with the purpose of this section, may seal from the public all documents or portions of documents, including all subsequently filed documents, that would identify the petitioner or contain sufficient information from which the petitioner's identity could be discerned or inferred. Access to identifying information may be permitted to law enforcement or other authorized authority, in the course of conducting official business, to effectuate service, enforcement, or prosecution, or as ordered by the courts. (f) Upon petition to a district court under this section, the court may temporarily restrain the person or persons named in the petition from harassing the petitioner or the public servant on whose behalf the petition is filed upon a determination that there is probable cause to believe that a past act or acts of harassment have occurred or that a threat or threats of harassment may be imminent. The court may issue an ex parte temporary restraining order either in writing or orally; provided that oral orders shall be reduced to writing by the close of the next court day following oral issuance. (g) A temporary restraining order that is granted under this section shall remain in effect at the discretion of the court for a period not to exceed ninety days from the date the order is granted, including, in the case where a temporary restraining order restrains any party from harassing a minor, for a period extending to a date after the minor has reached eighteen years of age. A hearing on the petition to enjoin harassment shall be held within fifteen days after the temporary restraining order is granted. If service of the temporary restraining order has not been effected before the date of the hearing on the petition to enjoin, the court may set a new date for the hearing; provided that the new date shall not exceed ninety days from the date the temporary restraining order was granted. The parties named in the petition may file or give oral responses explaining, excusing, justifying, or denying the alleged act or acts of harassment. The court shall receive all evidence that is relevant at the hearing and may make independent inquiry. If the court finds by clear and convincing evidence that harassment as defined in paragraph (1) of that definition exists, it may enjoin for [no] not more than three years further harassment of the petitioner[,] or the public servant on whose behalf the petition is filed, or that harassment as defined in paragraph (2) of that definition exists, it shall enjoin for [no] not more than three years further harassment of the petitioner[,] or the public servant on whose behalf the petition is filed, including, in the case where any party is enjoined from harassing a minor, for a period extending to a date after the minor has reached eighteen years of age; provided that this subsection shall not prohibit the court from issuing other injunctions against the named parties even if the time to which the injunction applies exceeds a total of three years. Any order issued under this section shall be served upon the respondent. For the purposes of this section, "served" means actual personal service, service by certified mail, or proof that the respondent was present at the hearing at which the court orally issued the injunction. Where service of a restraining order or injunction has been made or where the respondent is deemed to have received notice of a restraining order or injunction order, any knowing or intentional violation of the restraining order or injunction order shall subject the respondent to the provisions in subsection (i). Any order issued shall be transmitted to the chief of police of the county in which the order is issued by way of regular mail, facsimile transmission, or other similar means of transmission. (h) The court may grant the prevailing party in an action brought under this section costs and fees, including attorney's fees. (i) A knowing or intentional violation of a restraining order or injunction issued pursuant to this section [is] shall be a misdemeanor. The court shall sentence a violator to appropriate counseling and shall sentence a person convicted under this section as follows: (1) For a violation of an injunction or restraining order that occurs after a conviction for a violation of the same injunction or restraining order, the person shall be sentenced to a mandatory minimum jail sentence of not less than forty-eight hours; and (2) For any subsequent violation that occurs after a second conviction for violation of the same injunction or restraining order, the person shall be sentenced to a mandatory minimum jail sentence of not less than thirty days. The court may suspend any jail sentence, except for the mandatory sentences under paragraphs (1) and (2), upon appropriate conditions, [such as] including that the defendant remain alcohol- and drug-free, remain conviction-free, or complete court‑ordered assessments or counseling. The court may suspend the mandatory sentences under paragraphs (1) and (2) where the violation of the injunction or restraining order does not involve violence or the threat of violence. Nothing in this section shall be construed [as limiting] to limit the discretion of the judge to impose additional sanctions authorized in sentencing for a misdemeanor offense. (j) Nothing in this section shall be construed to prohibit constitutionally protected activity. (k) A petition filed by the public employer of a public servant under this section shall identify the petitioner as the respective branch of government, department, or agency; provided that the state judiciary shall be identified as the administrative director of the courts. (l) Notwithstanding any other law to the contrary, subject to the availability of funds appropriated for this purpose, the department of the attorney general shall establish a system by which a public employer of a public servant of the State may retain a private attorney to provide representation to the public employer to pursue an action under this section on behalf of a public servant of the State; provided that under no circumstance shall a public employer of a public servant of the State be permitted to retain a private attorney under this subsection if the person to be restrained is in the same branch of government. Under no circumstances shall the attorney general, the first deputy attorney general, the special assistant to the attorney general, or any deputy attorney general provide representation to a public employer or a public servant under this section. (m) Notwithstanding subsection (l), staff attorneys for the judiciary may represent a public servant of the State employed by the judiciary. The judiciary may utilize its own funds to retain a private attorney to represent a public servant of the State employed by the judiciary. (n) The authorization for a public employer to petition for relief under this section on behalf of a public servant shall be discretionary. Nothing in this section shall be construed to: (1) Create a duty for a public employer to petition for relief on behalf of a public servant; (2) Authorize a private right of action, whether in law or in equity, against the State or a public employer, including the administrative director of the courts or any public official, whether in an official or individual capacity, relating to or arising out of the filing of a petition for relief or a decision to decline to petition for relief under this section, and no court shall have subject matter jurisdiction to consider any claims relating to the same; or (3) Authorize a private right of action, whether in law or in equity, against the State, the department of the attorney general, or any officer or employee of the department of the attorney general, whether in an official or individual capacity, relating to or arising out of subsection (l), and no court shall have subject matter jurisdiction to consider any claims relating to the same." SECTION 3. Statutory material to be repealed is bracketed and stricken. New statutory material is underscored. SECTION 4. This Act shall take effect on July 1, 2026; provided that this Act shall be repealed on June 30, 2028, and section 604-10.5, Hawaii Revised Statutes, shall be reenacted in the form in which it read on the day prior to the effective date of this Act.
Every fact on this page links to its source, starting with the official bill record.